A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

Social responsibility

Google needs to do better in managing business reviews

A colleague retailer recently experienced someone posting a negative review for their business based on an incident that had occurred more that a year prior.

The review was unfair given that it related to a customer complaining about the business following the public health mask guidelines at the time.

The reviewer used an email address that does not work and did not use their real name.

The review was clearly posted to harm the reputation of the newsagency, and done so anonymously.

I have seen plenty of local retail businesses unfairly attacked through Google reviews. It’s time Google provided a transparent process for managing them, to ensure fairness for all concerned.

In my own case I have had a couple of different people using fake names, and who were never customers, post negative reviews for my software company.

That Google allows anonymous reviews to be posted and does not engage in reasonable discussion as to the facts as claimed in a review damages the reputation of reviews overall. The company needs to provide checks and balances given the commercial harm that negative reviews can cause.

6 likes
Social responsibility

Local school parent groups and charities need to change their approach to asking small business retailers for donations

Local small business retailers are asked several times week by school parent groups and other local community groups and charities for donations. Here is one example I saw yesterday. I share it as it demonstrates what not to do. It’s lazy, ignorant and disrespectful. It’s one-way. While I’m sure they think acknowledging the business on advertising has value, it does not.

If I was speaking with this school parent group I’d tell them the one thing they could do to get engagement from local retailers:

Shop with them.

Yes, it’s that simple.

Now, this could work a couple of ways. Getting parents to shop with local retailers could be leveraged to get local retailers to donate to the parents group. Better still,  local retailers could set up a mutual loyalty program in their POS software. each purchase could reward the parents and the parent’s group. It’s easy to track this, to trade with local retailers to build a bank that is donated to the parent’s group.

Local retail businesses are only able to donate to community groups if they have the financial capacity. The only way they achieve that is when people;e spend money in their shops. This is why the starting point for any charity or community group putting their hand out to any business is to ask: What are we doing for them? What are we doing to enable them to donate to us? If the answer is nothing, then fix that first.

Big businesses say yes to donations as they budget for it and because they see it as easy marketing. They have a corporate umbrella cover bring them. A family owned local retail business is stand-alone. It relies on day to day trade. This is why any donation needs to be considered transactionally.

Local small business retailers could be on the front foot about this. They could setup a mutual loyalty program so it’s all set and ready to go, so next time a charity or community group puts out their hand they, instead, pitch the loyalty program that, if engaged with, could be more financially rewarding for the community group or charity.

Now, there may be some in the community groups or charities who say it’s too complex or challenge why they have to shop in a shop to get it to donate. If you hear that, it shows ignorance, and it demonstrates how little they actually value you.

I’d written about this topic before. It is frustrating seeing the ignorance displayed by some groups when they ask for donations. Their approach, like the example above, demonstrates a lack of understanding about how business works.

22 likes
Social responsibility

Appalling editorial decision by the Sydney Morning Herald in seeking to out Rebel Wilson

So, it was an abundance of caution and respect that this media outlet emailed Rebel Wilson’s representatives on Thursday morning, giving her two days to comment on her new relationship with another woman, LA leisure wear designer Ramona Agruma, before publishing a single word.

Big mistake. Wilson opted to gazump the story, posting about her new “Disney Princess” on Instagram early Friday morning, the same platform she had previously used to brag about her handsome ex-boyfriend, wealthy American beer baron Jacob Busch.

This ‘story‘ in The Sydney Morning Herald reflects, in my opinion, poorly on the editorial decisions of the newspaper.

They are upset that Rebel Wilson decided to come out, ahead of their story. While we will never know if Rebel would have made the announcement as and when she did, what we do know is that the enquiry from the SMH and their advice they would run the story preceded it.

In the SMH story they try and justify their behaviour.

Considering how bitterly Wilson had complained about poor journalism standards when she successfully sued Woman’s Day for defamation, her choice to ignore our discreet, genuine and honest queries was, in our view, underwhelming.

This, in a story that reflects poor journalism, poor editorial decisions and reads like bullying.

No news outlet, no person has the right to out anyone. It is no one else’s business until the person or people directly involved decide. When it is done it is hurtful, harmful and, too often, dangerous.

There is no newsworthiness in Rebel Wilson’s personal life, unless your business model is predicated on making money off of gossip.

The story in the SMH makes them the story, their editorial choices and how they treat gay people, threaten them, bully them. That’s how I see it. And, yes, I have a vested interest in that it happened to me years ago, not in the SMH or any newspaper, but my agency was taken from me by gossips and others.

How the SMH has handled the story could impact others in the closet, famous or not as it shows anyone that outing someone is okay and that pressuring them about their sexuality is okay. It is not okay to out someone and it is not okay to pressure someone to come out.

The SMH has diminished itself through its behaviour on this. The masthead owes an apology to Rebel Wilson.

Why does this matter here? We sell this stuff and some days I hate that I do.

17 likes
Ethics

Not all shopping centres are recovering from Covid the same

While high street shopping appears to be strong and better than pre-Covid, for at least most of the stores I have seen data for, in shopping centres it is a different story.

Retailers in some centres are doing well while some in other centres are down significantly on 2019 trade.

I’d like to see state and federal governments work together to capture accurate data to assess the situation, to help us understand how shopping centres, overall, are performing in 2022 compared to pre-Covid and, then, how each centre is performing. 

I suspect an independent study would reveal significant differences in the performance of each centre. I am sure we would see some centres have bounced back while others have not. It is in that second group, where tenants are dealing with annual rental increases of 5% and more where we may find significant financial pressure, brought on by Covid.

Any study should only be about understanding the situation, and not about laying blame. If one centre is performing poorly while another is performing well, it does not mean the poorly performing centre is being run poorly. There are many factors that could be driving the different results. We can’t consider that until we have the data. That’s why a government-led study would be useful.

While landlords have sales data, their interests are too vested, too narrow, for that to be of value nationally. An independent assessment of the situation would be helpful, especially for the independent retailers in these centres.

In one situation I was looking at this week, revenue is stubbornly sitting at 20% less than in 2019 for a vibrant and appealing business that is engaged on social media and undertaking other marketing to attract shoppers. Their business is in a category that is strong out on the high street.

In another situation, revenue is down 15% which nearby retailers in the same category are up 20% … and the nearby retailers are doing less marketing and offer a less appealing (in any opinion) experience than in the shopping centre.

But this post is not about specific retailers. Rather, it is a call for a national assessment of retail performance in shopping centres so that we can understand if there is a problem, and if so, the centres in which the problem is amplified. Again, landlords are unlikely to drive this. That’s why I hope governments engage.

With most of the Covid support now gone, small business retailers have few options. Those in shopping centres that are yet to be back at pre-Covid trading levels are facing operating costs that, for some, will be unsustainable. No one wins from that – the landlord, governments, the community, the owners. The sooner we have data to understand if there is an issue and the scope of it the better.

12 likes
Newsagency management

With Covid impacting staffing and other aspects of retail

Here’s our approach to mitigating to Covid challenge in our shops:

  • Screens at the counter. We have retained these as they offer protection for us and customers. There is zero customer push-back.
  • Masks. We urge team members to wear masks when working.
  • Sanitiser. Remains freely available in-store.
  • Cleaning. Remains at peak Covid levels. All common touchpoint are cleaned on a regular cycle.
  • Vaccination. All team members are asked to get vaccination boosters as soon as they are eligible.

This pandemic has a ways to go yet. The reported infection rate is high, meaning the real rate is much higher. Worse, the death rate is tragic.

5 likes
Social responsibility

Advice for suppliers pitching to local small business retailers

Do you have any idea how many pitches a retailer gets from suppliers every day?

Many, too many, every day. And, what makes it worse is that there is a sameness to the pitches – over written, loaded with claims and rarely tuned to my local business needs. Most emails or calls or visits come from a place of selfishness, based on what they need. A better approach would be them thinking first how can they help, how can they add value to your business without you having to commit?

There is too much lazy communication. And, I say this as a retailer and a supplier to retailers. I have made the mistake of sending emails and letters that were selfish. When I switched my approach to add value, or at least try and genuinely add value, sales surged. It built trust. Giving away knowledge that any retailer could use without having to spend anything is key to this.

So, what matters to retailers, what does a supplier need to do to get their attention?

In my opinion – I say that deliberately since every retailer will have their own views on this – here is how a supplier can get my attention:

  • Be clear and efficient in communication. Don’t over write, don’t wrap your pitch in fluff.
  • Be factual. Give me data, which can be fact-checked, that shows the value of the pitch to my business. For example, what Google search data is there to indicate shopper interest in the products or the product categories?
  • Be helpful. Explain what you provide beyond inventory that could be helpful: images, social media collateral, product descriptions, electronic invoices.
  • Be focussed. Sending me a link to your catalogue is hilarious. Sure, I have an hour to click your link, probably apply for a password if you are really bad at your job, and trawl through pagers looking for what I am not sure. The fewer keystrokes I have to click to engage with you the better.
  • Have stock. Suppliers selling in advance of having stock only to find not everything arrives is a waste of our time.

I am in business to sell product as this is what enables me to pay rent, wages, overheads and myself. Anything that you send my or pitch to me that does not obviously support my needs is a waste of my time.

Thinking about this, sell price, margin and stock turn are all factors. I am keen for products that leverage all three. A supplier pitching a product at a discount has me wary, regardless of the extent of the discount. Cheap product is useless unless it sells, and, ideally, faster than usual.

For too long, our channel has been pitched to through old-school approaches. Covid, thankfully, has shown that we can thrive without some of these. The future is ahead of us, not back in those past ways. Smart suppliers have learned through Covid, they have found ways to pitch efficiently and effectively, to cut through and deliver to retailers what retailers want / need. Fewer rep visits. fewer cold calls. Fewer bland emails.

When I am buying today I preference:

  • Genuinely Australian made.
  • Immediately available.
  • Free samples for products that sell more easily if there are samples for customers.
  • Ranges that tell a story.
  • Ranges I can leverage to find new shoppers.

Here are some other points related to this discussion about supplier engagement with local retailers …

You are not entitled.

I appreciate that may came off as offensive. That’s not my intent. But, it is true. We owe you nothing, regardless of your connection to our business. Any supplier is only as valuable as their last product supply.

No thanks.

That’s the best default response to every supplier pitch. Start with no. make them work for it. make them work harder to get their inventory into your shop.

Start with no and encourage them to make a business case.

You don’t have an appointment.

That alone should have you showing any drop-in the door. The moment you agree to meet with a drop-in rep weakens your position. The more we make the point that drop-ins are not welcome the better they will treat us.

A coffee, a beer or lunch are irrelevant to what you should stock.

There are plenty of old-school suppliers who think buying you a coffee or a beer or more is the best way to get you to bu from them.  I’m in business for business reasons, not social reasons. Let’s stay focussed on business, and is good social times flow, great – but let’s not lead with that.

Buying space.

Some suppliers seek to guarantee engagement by paying for shelf space or fixtures. Too often, this does not serve the retailer well. While a supplier funding a nice looking fixture or covering the lease cost of some space may feel like a good move for cash flow, it is only a good move if the inventory they please there turns well, better than what you could do yourself. This type of funding comes at a cost to the business.

13 likes
Ethics

UK partworks publisher Eaglemoss ditches Aussie newsagents after years of loyal service for a paltry margin

UK artworks publisher Eaglemoss has decided to supply the Doctor Who part series from issue 201 on direct to customers in Australia. The decision was announced in a letter to collectors.

Eaglemoss has not written to newsagents thanking them for their years of loyal service.

I reached out to the company through a couple of social media platforms querying the decision and received no response.

Eaglemoss has consistently failed to provide newsagents reasonable supply of artworks titles, so I wonder how they will go at providing their direct customers with product. Given their lacklustre customer service, I wonder how Australian subscribers will fare. There is no evidence to suggest it will go well.

It is disappointing the artworks experts at Are Direct were unable to retain previous distribution arrangements for newsagents. I wonder what their take is on the decision? Maybe I missed an announcement from them on this.

Is this the end of artworks in Australian newsagencies? It’s hard to say. But, the future is not bright. That won’t bother plenty who gave up on artworks after years and years of supply failures and the ever present competiton of sweet direct subscription deals.

To some us, however, artworks have been terrific traffic generators that we have sought to leverage into other opportunities. I have written about this plenty of times here. While their value has waned in the years since the closure of the Bissett business, a good part series was one I’d always engage with – primarily because of the TV campaign that specifically tagged our channel. It was the one time we were exclusively named in a TVC.

But back to Eaglemoss and their decision to ditch local Aussie newsagents as the retailers of the Doctor Who part series. Shame on them for their treatment of Aussie newsagents. We deserve better from them. Their Australian collectors deserve better from them.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Of course, this decision plays into a narrative about magazines, which is challenging to avoid. The problem is, we have big business vested interests who are unlikely to engage in genuinely transparent dialogue on the topic.

11 likes
Ethics

The Texas Tribune coverage of the horror at Uvalde is a reminder of the value of local independent journalism

What happened at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde a few days ago is awful, horrible. That it is a repeat of too many similar tragedies represents an appalling failure of leadership at many levels of US government.

The Texas Tribune is a not for profit newspaper.

This Twitter thread from Sewell Chan, the Editor in Chief of the Texas Tribune shows the importance and value of community funded independent journalism. I share it today to highlight their excellent journalism and to provide insights from Texas on what happened and some history. If you have a moment, I urge you to read what Sewell shared on Twitter:

9 likes
Social responsibility

What’s the value of newspaper advertising?

Clive Palmer is reported to have spent close to $100 million on advertising during the federal election campaign with a significant chunk of that spent on newspaper ads.

If seats in parliament was the goal, the advertising failed.

While we could critique the ads as being the cause of the failure, the issue could also be the medium.

Is newspaper advertising as valuable as it once was?

We already know newspapers are not as valuable for the once rivers of gold real estate, employment and car advertising.

I am sure people far more skilled than me will dissect the Palmer ad spend and consider what it may indicate for newspapers and their publishers.

I’d be particularly interested in scholarly assessment of the Palmer spend coupled with the clear bias of News Corp in its propaganda type coverage supporting the Coalition parties and negatively covering Labor, and their even more negative coverage of the independents.

From a newsagent perspective, we are part of the distribution channel for print newspapers. The topic should interest us in the context of the role of newspapers in our future. I think this election showed us that newspapers, particularly the News Corp newspapers, are not as important or influential as they have been.

Will this 2022 federal election be something we look back on in the future as a point in time where the value the medium was significantly diluted because the actions of some newspaper publishers demonstrated disrespect for what was once a valued moral authority.

I know of a couple of newsagents who recently moved newspapers from the front of the shop to the rear because of election coverage in their main daily newspaper.

After writing this I caught up with the latest Media Watch …

9 likes
Ethics

Strong interest in environmentally friendly stationery

I have tested a range of products on social media over the last few months, to gauge interest in products pitched as environmentally friendly.

In my experience, pitching a product with a positive environmental story will see that post reach more people, usually 3 to 4 times more people.

Here are two recent products I have see this happen with.

The pitch in each case was simple … noting we are grateful to be able to offer these products.

For a retail channel with some less than ideal environmental credentials, like paper wastage from unsold magazines for example, products like these can be helpful in adjusting the narrative.

In our own social media engagement we tend to seek out products like these rather than featuring products that more often get time in the sun.

5 likes
Social responsibility

We need better reporting of federal election debate over the minimum wage

You’d think it’s the end of the world as we know it if there is a $1.00 an hour increase to the minimum wage based on the ‘news’ coverage of this debate. Across a range of media outlets business lobbyists, conservative politicians, retailer representatives and some retailers themselves have been saying how awful such an increase would be.

Yesterday, on ABC radio Melbourne and 3AW there were retailers saying products had gone up 200% and 300% and other costs had gone up and a $1.00 an hour wage increase would eat into margin.

Gee, I wish there was fact checking of these claims.

And, I wish there was more comprehensive questioning.

And, if there is a case, it would be good for transparency around the details.

Pretty much every retailer I know has has signed a lease agreeing to an annual 5% increase in rent, sometimes more. That’s right, they contracted this 5% rent increase to be annual.

So, here’s my question? If people make a business, as so many retailers say, why would there be any hesitation on a 5% increase in pay for people … for without them, there may be no business.

Like, why agree to an annual locked-in 5% increase in rent costs but not labour?

A business on a knife edge that goes under for a $38.00 increase in the cost of an employee for 38 hours in a week is a business with a problem anyway.

People on the minimum wage are likely to spend what they earn. That helps the economy. That $1 an hour is beneficial for the economy.

We need smarter journalists who ask more thoughtful questions and who challenge selfishness. I want to hear the retailers asked about paying more rent every year and how they justify this while not wanting to pay their valued employees more every year.

It would be good to sit with a retailer who says they cannot afford the extra $1 an hour and unpack their business numbers from P&L back through inventory data, roster decisions … all decisions that gets the business to the point where $1 an hour is not affordable.

Sure, I want my business costs to fall. And, sure, I want to make more money. The reality is that we are all participants in this one economy. Constant squeezing that the bottom end is bad for those being squeezed, the economy and society. We should care about that.

As for the claims about products costing more. Some do cost more. But they cost more for everyone. There are smart ways to deal with product cost increases. It is lazy to complain. It is appalling to suggest that because of those cost increases you should not pay your employees more.

I appreciate my take will upset some. That’s not my intention. I want an intelligent discussion about wages and business costs, so that all participants understand the facts and, hopefully, through this better understand more sides of the debate on wages.

But, let’s think for a moment, how could small business retailers respond to a $1 an hour increase in labour cost?

The best response is to engage with it on the shop floor. Here are my suggestions:

  • Make sure everyone working in your business understands the numbers: where you make  money and where you do not make money. Yes, this means being open on the business numbers. A couple of decades ago there was a movement led by the awesome Jack Stack, Open Book Management, it helped turn plenty of businesses around. The more those working in the business understand the numbers the more likely they will work with you.
  • Show the connection between what the business makes and what they make or could make through more hours or, even, a bonus(!!).
  • Set goals for the business and people in the business who can make a difference to the business performance.
  • Make decisions based on evidence for its is these decisions that make local retail shops more money than gut decisions.
  • Drive your overall business GP. The higher that is the more you are insulated from increases in your two biggest cost areas: labour and occupancy.
  • Think about each decision through the prism of: does this position me better to deal with rising costs, including rising wages costs.
  • Turn around and look back into your business for it is likely there are things you can do right now to improve your position. Here is the most easy move: look at inventory you have on the shelves that has not sold in 6 months or more. It’s dead stock. Dead cash, unless you sell it for something. Mine your business data and find opportunities like this.

I could go on. If a $1 an hour increase in labour cost bothers you, confront it as a business opportunity rather than a pure negative. It’s a door opening opportunity I think.

It frustrates me that the wages debate is a debate, with sides. All of us in business benefit if more people in the economy, our economy, have more money to spend, especially if they are in the cohort likely to spend money. If we could all talk about this without taking firm sides we’d have a better opportunity of navigating a path forward we are all happy with.

23 likes
Ethics

WH Smith at Melbourne Airport is expensive

It is frustrating seeing a retailer take shoppers for fools. I think this is what WH Smith is doing at Melbourne Airport. They are promoting a multi buy of Allen’s Party Mix of 2 for $6.50.

Here’s the product.

Right now at Coles, the price is $2,50.

At Woolworths too.

At the IGA in Natalia, they have the product at the regular price of $3.00.

All of this begs the question, how is the WH Smith price special? Well, it’s not special. They want you to buy two, and pay more than if you planned ahead and bought at the supermarket. And, I guess, that’s what is happening here – their pricing is convenience premium.

Given that these products are readily available elsewhere, I wonder what the ACCC would make of the pricing approach that suggests a discount.

3 likes
Social responsibility

Must read: Paper cuts: Why daily newspaper deliveries have become a lottery

The Citizen (A PUBLICATION OF THE CENTRE FOR ADVANCING JOURNALISM, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE) has published a terrific report into the actions of News Corp. and Nine Media in removing newspaper home delivery from local small business newsagents and putting it under the control of a faceless, contactless mess of an organisation.

I am grateful to Petra Stock for the time she took to understand the issues and speak with some directly impacted. Her reporting on the impact on local family-owned Lygon Media speaks volumes to the disinterest in the offices of News Corp. and Nine Media in delivering a local service for local newspaper readers.

Lygon Media Distributors – a newspaper distribution business co-owned by Fabian Pizzica – made its final delivery run on Sunday, 27 March. Mr Pizzica has been selling or delivering newspapers since 1989, working from age 18 in his father’s Lygon Street newsagent.

In the mid ‘90s, brothers Fabian and Nick joined forces with cousins Robert and Pat (who has since passed away) to form the newspaper distribution arm of the business.

From a few suburban paper runs they grew Lygon Media into a service that stretched from the northern suburbs down to Docklands and Port Melbourne and delivered around 15,000 papers a day.

Lygon Media Distributors closed after newspaper distribution changes. Photo: Petra Stock

Until recently, the family-owned company was one of eight-to-10 remaining larger newspaper distributors, which alongside around 100 smaller newsagents, delivered daily papers around greater Melbourne.

As one of the larger operators, Mr Pizzica says Lygon Media had hoped to win a contract under the new model when News Corp invited tenders last year.

“We were out there buying up territories, increasing the volume. We were spending money and borrowing money to buy more territories, thinking that we’d be big enough for [News Corp] to look favourably on us,” Mr Pizzica says.

But their efforts didn’t deliver a contract. Now, he says, he’s out of a job and the business “isn’t worth anything and we have to pay off debt”.

We’ve all seen, and heard, how upset newspaper customers are with the poor service being provided by the News Corp and Nine Media controlled newspaper home delivery, which can only lead to reduced sales for print editions of their mastheads.

The report by The Citizen provides timely and appreciated coverage.

Personally, I am so lucky to have sold my home delivery runs in 2006, back when they had a good value. But through my newsagency software company, I speak daily with newsagents who did not or could not do this, newsagents who have had tens of thousands, and more, in goodwill ripped from them by the changes to newspaper distribution. This all started in the newsagency channel more than. 20 years ago. Those representing newsagents at the time have plenty to answer for enemy opinion.

15 likes
Ethics

Working from home

I am grateful to Dan Ziffer and the ABC for the opportunity to participate in this story about working from home. I am also thankful to colleague Jennifer for being willing to be interviewed and to Michael and Minh for their live shots and to some other crew members for joining on the Zoom. Here’s a link to the full story: https://iview.abc.net.au/video/NC2206H037S00

The story itself is an indicator of changes in reporting. Dan shot the interview with Jennifer at home and myself in our office over 2 days. The content made its way onto radio, TV and online.

On the topic itself, for us, engagement came about because some people were calling for a return to the city, a return to offices. That didn’t make sense to me so I wrote about it. Dan Ziffer from the ABC noticed that. My view is there is no going back to office blocks full of people. People who can work from home should be able to. People who want to work in an office should be able to.

16 likes
Social responsibility

The challenge of begging in the streets for retailers

Someone sitting on the ground out the front of a shop asking people for spare change is a challenge for the retailer. While some will drop some coins into the cup or cap, some will shop elsewhere to avoid the interaction.

There are other situations where relationships form. I saw this recently in Melbourne where a shopkeeper was closing up for the night and said goodnight by name to the person sitting out the front of their shop asking for spare change. That person said goodnight to the shopkeeper by name.

In Sydney, I have seen the same person on the busy CBD corner for more than 10 years, pitching the same story about needing money for medicine.

I get that many people are living in challenging and fragile situations and that there are significant cracks in the state and federal support platforms available for homeless, unemployed and other vulnerable people, and that this leads to some hitting the streets asking for money. I also understand that there are some who exploit locations, as a form of employment.

For the retailer with someone begging out front, it can be stressful, worrying. It can be hard to know what to do. While begging is illegal in Victoria, there is good commentary from experts that fines for beggars are not the answer.

Justice Connect published an interesting report about begging in Victoria, which I found useful.

In considering how to respond to a specific local situation we have to consider the situation of the person begging, people who want to shop with you, your own team members and others in the community. It is complex, and unlikely to have a simple or linear solution. Each retailer needs to discover the path that is best for them and those they share the situation with.

In my own case, since it is infrequent at the moment, I have found becoming more aware of the situation to be a useful first step. I have also spent some time looking for a respected homelessness related charity with which to connect, and support. I have settled on Launch Housing if you are interested. They do good, practical work, a secular organisation with a good track record. I like that they show the value of a donation in terms of rooms provided.

I understand that paying someone else money does not necessarily resolve your issue and that it can been see as payment to make a feeling of guilt go away. As I said, Launch Housing support is a first step.  The next step, next time someone is begging in front of the shop, it to try and understand. But I reckon that will be easier said than done.

Begging is a complex challenge, and it feels like it is on the increase. Plenty of local small business retailers and close to the front line of this challenge.

18 likes
Social responsibility

Covid challenges staffing in local small business retail

Not being reported anywhere with accuracy, because it is impossible to track, is the days lost each week in businesses, including local retail businesses, due to Covid.

With financial support almost all closed off now, businesses and employees (depending on employment status) are left carrying the cost.

What magnifies the cost of Covid to businesses is late detection, which has come about because in the change in narrative focus by state and federal governments. Whereas in the past, early detection was key, today, the approach is casual, with no pressure. This adds to infection, especially in close proximity settings, like in retail.

The situation is also exacerbated by softening messages around masks, sanitiser and those steps early in the pandemic that were considered crucial to reducing the infection rate.

In our businesses with a small labour pool, the cost of an infection within the team can be considerable. This leaves us to apply our own rules, like continuing to use masks even when they are not mandated, maintaining acrylic screens at the counter, encouraging the use of hand sanitiser and keeping surfaces clean.

While I get that vaccines have reduced the impact Covid can have on many, it continues to be a risk to those unable to be vaccinated. It is also a risk to the vaccinated in that a diagnosis with Covid means you’re off work for a week, and that has a cost to you or your employer. In some business settings with no spare labour capacity, it can cause the business to close.

I was in Dubai last week and talking to some of the locals, they are happy that masks continue to be mandated outside, in all settings. A couple of retailers I spoke with said this was a key factor in them not being affected.

Here in  Australia, the noise of people demanding freedom has won and we are is a situation where the infection rate is higher, and the costs for business, individuals, and governments, are higher.

Looking at data, in the UAE, with a mask mandate, the current infection rate is 87,000 per 1M population. In Australia, that number is 151,000 while in the US, with a noise freedom chanting group, the number is 243,000.

As a business owner carrying the cost of employees being diagnosed with Covid, I wish this was happening less, that the impact on people on our team was less, that the costs hitting the business were less.

Freedom is more expensive that the measures we all took early in the pandemic.

In the meantime, in my own businesses, I encourage as much as I am able team members to wear masks and take precautions for themselves and their own loved-ones.

10 likes
Social responsibility

Local newsagents impacted by floods

The floods in Queensland and New South Wales are hitting hard with homes and shops under water.

The extent of the impact for many, especially those in business, will not be clear until they are permitted to return to their shops. All they can do for now is look on at the footage shot by drones.

Some already know from what they have seen that their shops will have to be gutted. Flooding like this does extraordinary damage, leaving little to be salvaged.

I know there are plenty of us in the channel, newsagents and suppliers alike, thinking of our colleagues facing tough times right now.

We have been watching this unfold since late last week. It is disappointing that it was not until today that some practical federal assistance was announced.

Hopefully, practical assistance will be more forthcoming than the promised bushfire relief funds announced two years ago and not delivered.

8 likes
Social responsibility

Covid rapid tests available for immediate delivery

Through my work with newsXpress and a national pharmacy group I have been sourcing Covid rapid tests. From the latest shipment, which arrived at the office this morning, there are a few boxes of spare stock.

Each retail pack has 5 tests. Each box has 240 retail packs. The wholesale price of $43.90 per retail pack (plus GST) delivered for 240. That is $10,536.00 for a carton of 240 retail test packs delivered. or $44.90 (plus GST) for 120 delivered, or $5,388.00 per 120 delivered.

The current retail price ranges between $55.00 and $75.00 for these 5-test packs.

The tests are the TGA approved Clungene tests.

If you are interested, please email me direct rapid@towersystems.com.au.

4 likes
Social responsibility

People are more curious of product origins

One consequence of Covid that I am noticing in retail is that shoppers are more curious about product origins. More are interested and ask, and, if there is a choice between locally made and imported, there are enough preferencing locally made to for us to speak to that in buying and marketing.

As a retailers we are more aware ourselves about products that pitch Aussie or an Aussie connection, which may have been made offshore. In these instances, more shoppers notice and comment, as someone did at the Coles checkout I was at the other day, pointing out these made ins China “Aussie” bags.

It is sourcing like this that can bite a retailer. And, rightly so in my opinion. The only Aussie thing about the bags is the use of chant often hears at sports events. Okay, it says they were designed in Australia. There does not seem to be much to the design.

The bags feel like a misstep by Coles to me, but I doubt people will care. They are cheap and at the counter for easy purchase when needed.

This is where local retail businesses can make a difference. Okay, local sourcing of bags means they will be more expensive, but through this we can call out those shipping Aussie cash and jobs offshore. It all depends on what people want.

In local small business retail we want shoppers and we seek this by being different. Sourcing more locally is one way we can speak to our difference. This matters if our businesses are hit up by local charities to support them. This is where the whole sourcing local issue becomes circular. We can only help them if they help us and helping us means helping keep more jobs and Aussie cash locally.

It’s a hard care to make when so many do buy on price. My experience is that there are enough buying based in value, as opposed to price, and they are more loyal to our businesses.

As a result of Covid and challenges in the supply chain, people are more interested in sourcing locally. This is an opportunity for us.

6 likes
Social responsibility

Covid rapid test opportunity

Through the newsXpress retail marketing group business I own I have access to Covid rapid tests. The first shipment sold out. We have access to two more charter flights landing Feb 11 and Feb 16. The tests being imported are TGA approved: Clungene and Alltest. Each retail pack has 5 tests. Each box has 240 retail packs. The wholesale price of $43.90 per retail pack (plus GST) delivered. That is $10,536.00 for a carton of 240 retail test packs delivered. The current retail price ranges between $60.00 and $75.00 for these 5-test packs, putting the 240 units at a retail value of between $14,000 and $18,000.

We have to finalise our next order today, and pay in advance for it on Monday.

If this interests you, please email rapid@towersystems.com.au with your business name and address and the number of boxes (240 retail packs per box) you would require.

We will get back to all who register with advice as to whether we hit the required minimum for the order. If it proceeds, we’d need payment by Monday.

Sorry, there is no opportunity to break the boxes.

The challenges with importing Covid tests are causing logistics costs to surge overseas and locally as there is a scramble for stock. This is a key factor in the wholesale being what it is.

3 likes
Social responsibility