Do newsagents need a newspaper distribution contract?
News and Fairfax are said to being close to putting new distribution contracts to newsagents for their consideration. The current contracts were negotiated in 1999 as part of the process of deregulation of newspaper and magazine distribution in Australia.
While newsagents and those who represent them will focus on the terms of the proposed contracts, I’d suggest newsagents first consider whether contracts are appropriate.
Distribution newsagents beat themselves up every day fulfilling their obligations under the current contracts for, in most cases, less than minimum wage.
Newsagents are paid less in real terms today for every newspaper they handle than ten years ago when the current contracts were negotiated. Newsagents cannot sustain themselves as the working poor.
By saying no to contracts we are saying no to being a distribution newsagent. This would be a big deal for most newsagents as we would be rejecting the very purpose for which our channel was created.
Not having a contract would give newsagents more freedom to define their own future. While many may fear such an opportunity, others have already found the freedom to be personally and financially rewarding.
I’d encourage newsagents and their associations to open debate on this and seriously question whether having a contract is important.
For the new contracts to be interesting, they need to improve compensation for newsagents and provide more local business control over the profitability of newspaper distribution. They would need to allow newsagents to be business people and not process workers.