A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

Magazine oversupply

What’s with the Stationery News reissue to newsagents

It seems the latest issue of Stationery News has been sent to newsagents, again. This time marked as a firm sale – meaning they are unable to return it.

This appears to be a mistake by Gotch. The challenge is the Gotch communication lines are clogged and emails are delayed in getting a response.

I’ve had at least ten calls plus emails. Here is one that sums up the situation:

This morning on the Gotch distribution they supplied a magazine, more a pamphlet, called “Stationary News” as a firm sale item with a cost of $55 and a retail of $60.50 ! When I rang Gotch , after a 40 minute wait, the helpful customer service office said that he had received a few calls in regard to it and he had lodged a query but they had been unable to work out why or how this had been allocated. He also stated that the more contact that they had from Newsagents the sooner something would be done about it.

11 likes
magazine distribution

Magazine circulation numbers demand change

The extraordinary fall in magazine circulation reported for the period to December 31, 2015 fits with what I reported earlier in the newsagency sales benchmark study – among the worst declines we have seen for many titles.

This cannot continue.

As I have written previously, the best opportunity for specialty magazine publishers, those publishing special interest titles, titles outside the top 20 sellers, is to focus solely on the newsagency channel. We are their best hope to stop the decline and, hopefully, grow sales.

Newsagents are specialty retailers. We understand catering to niche interests. To many of us, magazines are not a commodity.

  • Give us control over the titles we carry.
  • Give us control over the volume we receive.
  • Eliminate the requirement to return unsold stock.
  • Compensate us so we can make money from magazines.
  • Respect us.
  • Quit supermarkets and other mass retail channels.

Together we can arrest the decline of many magazine titles.

If you are publisher looking at this and saying sales are declining in newsagencies why would I do this – because what you pay today does not cover newsagent operating costs, why should newsagents support titles for less than a living wage?

31 likes
magazine distribution

Double load of magazines gets newsagents thinking more about magazine distribution

The double load of magazines newsagents received yesterday raised discussion, again, about unfairness in the magazine destitution model.

Rather than two days of delivery this week, the magazine distributors cut back to one day, a public holiday, and in doing so presented newsagents with more resourcing challenges for managing the load on a day with more than double the labour cost.

The move looks inconsiderate, ignorant and selfish.

Four newsagents I heard from told me their December 2015 magazine bill is equal to or more than December 2014 while their sales year on year are down between 9% and 13%. It does not take much to work out why they are angry.

24 likes
Ethics

More junk from Fairfax and Consolidates Products Holdings

IMG_2869We received this junk product from Consolidated Products Holdings via Fairfax with magazines today. As it is not circulation products, we have treated it as junk mail and binned it. I can source these iPhone products elsewhere at a better price.

Sending this out the week before Christmas is nuts, doomed to fail. Sending it out to newsagents at all is an abuse of the magazine distribution model.

14 likes
magazine distribution

Why do newsagents early return magazines and why is cutting space the only option to manage magazine costs?

Australian magazine publishers need to understand that they are all judged by the actions of each other. All it takes is for one publisher to oversupply and there are consequences for others.

I lay the blame with the publisher as they set the print run. This is where what we receive begins. The print run determines what is sent to the distributor to distribute. The distributor may have a contract requiring all copies sent to be distributed.

As newsagents have embraced better IT infrastructure they are better informed. The screen shot below shows the supply and return history for Australian House and Garden. There is no reason the newsagent should have received more stock on the new use. But they did.

I know of newsagents who respond to blatant oversupply by striking back at other titles from the same distributor. I don’t blame them sometimes as they feel helpless to manage cash-flow in any other way.

Take a look at this evidence for Australian House and Garden below from one newsagent for yourself. I am left wondering about the IT infrastructure at Network that allowed this to occur.

Screen Shot 2015-12-07 at 6.27.54 pm

What newsagents want is fair supply, to a level that helps them actually make money from magazines. The supply model in the MPA code of conduct does not have settings to enable this. Unless that is resolved, newsagents will have no alternative to early return and cut magazine space allocation.

If we cannot make money from any product it is not worth stocking and any model that forces us to do so would be unfair.

Publishers need to engage on this issue with thoughtful newsagents. Not the ANF as they have shown themselves to be out of touch, to not know what is appropriate for newsagents.

13 likes
Ethics

An example of how Network Services denies newsagents the ability to manage magazine supply

Publishers wondering why newsagents early return need to look at this example. The data on the Network Services website shows the sales volume. The newsagent is requesting supply closer to actual sales, to limit their financial exposure. The Network website rules forbid the newsagent from doing this. This is exactly the type of evidence that ought to be submitted to the ACCC.

Screen Shot 2015-11-30 at 10.17.39 am

14 likes
Ethics

Breaking our own early returning of magazines rule

IMG_2014I early returned The Australian Women’s Weekly Relax With Colour yesterday as there is no spare room and we are full with adult colouring titles from which we make 50% and more. I am not about to take space from them for a title from which we make half the reasonable gross profit.

Had Bauer asked, we would have said no thanks. Instead, we early returned the lot and broke a rule we have to not early return the day of issue.

9 likes
Magazine oversupply

A Christmas gift from Bauer Media to newsagents: oversupply

AWWI heard from a newsagent this morning that they have received 285 copies of the Christmas issue of the Australian Women’s Weekly to go on sale tomorrow. Last year they sold 145.

Based on trend data from 2015, a supply of 185 would have been reasonable. If there is something truly amazing and unexpected about this issue then maybe 200 copies would have been okay.

285 copies is ridiculous, a waste of paper, time, space and money.

Some magazine allocations genius has decided to send this newsagency a 36.6% increase in supply. There is no explanation, no reason for the newsagent to think it is warranted.

I know if I speak with the folks at Bauer they will have an explanation, they always do. However, this type of oversupply continues and newsagents carry the cost. It is not good enough.

Bauer is part of the MPA and the MPA is making a big deal about a marketing campaign they are running next year to promote newsagencies. I think that investment is a waste unless they fix the oversupply issue, unless they respect newsagents through their actions.

I am constantly asked why newsagents are cutting magazine space. Here in this blog post is an explanation of the key reason.

Independent publishers need to pressure all publishers to stop this oversupply nonsense.

Here is exactly what the newsagent wrote to me. I am sharing it here to show the frustration they are experiencing:

Just arrived tomorrows mags as we received them today, we received 285 AWW ! Now I know it is the xmas issue but last xmas we got 209 and returned 64 copies. This would have to be the most blatant oversupply I have possibly seen. Plus there would have been approx 6 different Adult colouring mags as well. I might make a call to AWW today and make a complaint, not only is it wasting their money ( we top all mags ) its wasting mine as well

Is this unconscionable conduct?

13 likes
Ethics

If NewsLifeMedia wants to help newsagents…

IMG_1973NewsLifeMedia is part of the MPA and as such they are participating in an initiative next year to promote newsagencies because they want to help our channel grow. Well, here is one way they can help us grow:

Do not send stock we do not need.

Take their new adult colouring titles. They entered the market too late, months too late. The product is not appealing to those buying multiple copies. Also, smart newsagents are sourcing their own product from which they make 50% and more rather than the 25% we get from magazines.

So, if NewsLifeMedia wants to help newsagents, they ought to behave in a way that is more commercial respectful of us.

To any magazine publisher thinking they can enter this adult colouring space and ship product off to newsagents: don’t! We are saturated with magazine titles and our own product we have sourced from book publishers for better margin. Do not abuse the magazine distribution model and newsagents with stock we do not need.

20 likes
magazine distribution

I urge magazine publishers to make newsagencies magazine specialists once more – ditch supermarkets

I response to the article in mUmBRELLA last week reporting comments about newsagents by two publishers, I offered to write in support of newsagents and with a suggestion on how to grow magazine sales and support small business newsagents.

mUmBRELLA published my contribution yesterday. In this article I call on magazine publishers to supply newsagents and not supermarkets, thereby refreshing us as magazine specialists, giving us commercial reason to re-engage with the channel and allowing us reason to support the category as professionals and not as competitors to better funded and better supported but less engaged competitors.

I am serious in this suggestion as I am confident that if magazine publishers were to supply newsagents and not supply supermarkets, newsagents would partner with them to arrest the sales decline.

Newsagent responds to magazine publisher complaints and advice

It is frustrating reading that magazine publishers bagged newsagents at an industry forum without newsagents having a reasonable right of reply. But maybe that is how publishers like it, maybe they don’t want to mix with newsagents. We do, after all, only sell 50% of magazines sold in Australia.

Nicole Sheffield, the CEO of NewsLifeMedia says we need to exert more control on the titles we receive. Ash Hunter, CEO of Hunterfive Group, says newsagents entering the channel are of a poor standard.

While these opinions could be factors in challenges for magazines, they are only opinions. Sheffield, Hunter and other publishers ought to look at the facts. They took what was a specialist channel and took from it around 50% of magazine revenue and gifted it to supermarkets and convenience stores.

This new competitive landscape facilitated by the publishers left newsagents with less profitable titles. Newsagents and now, finally, responding by reducing retail space and labour they invest in the magazine channel. This is causing newsagents to not display all the magazine inventory sent as they no longer have the space for it.

Indeed, there is a fundamental disconnect between the retail space available in newsagencies and the inventory sent. Talk to Gotch and Network and they will agree – they do not know the retail space allocated to magazines and that they do not know is not a factor in what they send. Nuts!

If Australia wants a profitable magazine publishing channel it needs a profitable route to market. Newsagents are the best opportunity. Plenty of them want to be the magazine specialist, a destination for the magazine shopper. But the numbers do not work. The numbers could work if publishers ignored supermarkets and helped direct more magazine traffic to newsagencies.

My proposal is simple – make newsagents the magazine specialists by only supplying them.

This single move, of choosing to place titles exclusively in the newsagency channel, would encourage newsagent support. I am not talking here about one or two titles. No, I am talking about hundreds of titles, popular titles, titles in the top 200 even. Place these exclusively in the newsagency channel and you change the game, you get the attention of newsagents, you push back against the supermarkets and you respect your product.

While I am confident that a bold move such as I outline here would benefit publishers and newsagents it would need careful negotiating, involving many titles and requiring thoughtful newsagent engagement. And, yes, there would need to be a discussion on margin. Rent and labour in retail are considerable expenses and titles not paying their way serve no purpose in any retail business. However, margin can be considered in various forms. For example, there could be a base stocking fee or some other levy to support the category.

If sought after product is only available in one channel then the two main parties to such a relationship, the publisher and newsagents, ought to benefit. We would have a shared commercial objective, far more so than exists today.

My call to Sheffield, Hunter and other magazine publishers with opinions about magazines in newsagencies is simple – engage with us, invite us to your conferences, work with us on a =n alternative model as the current model is not working for anyone. Oh, and don’t engage with the newsagent associations as they are out of touch on this and most other issues as history has shown.

Footnote: I’d love Nicole Sheffield to explain the News Corp. position on pricing Inside Out $2.00 a copy less in Coles than in newsagencies.

35 likes
magazine distribution

Why I want higher margin better selling diaries

IMG_0012The space allocated to these diaries costs close to $40 a week in rent. That is what I need in gross profit each week to cover the space cost.

Publishers say the sale or return model mitigates risk along with the generosity of delayed billing. Neither of these things pay the rent and rent is the issue. It goes up 5% every year without fail. We either sell more or get higher GP$.

Unless publishers address the rent issue, newsagents will continue to reduce space allocated to lower margin product.

13 likes
magazine distribution

Advice for newsagents on how to manage magazine space allocation for profit

Screen Shot 2015-09-24 at 8.51.37 pmWith magazine cover prices not keeping up and no movement in newsagent margin percentage, the only option is to cut the cost of carrying magazines. While most newsagents have cut labour costs by using newsagency software to manage sales and returns, many are yet to manage the retail space.

I created a spreadsheet space cost calculator. This is the first step to managing magazine space for profit: understand your weekly magazine pocket cost. It could be that your cost is small, making magazines profitable.

In most newsagencies, however, the high cost of retail space and the high cost of labour will mean a high per pocket cost. Pocket costs are exacerbated by systematic and planned gross oversupply of stock to newsagents.

The best way to cut the overhead costs associated with magazines is to reduce the space allocated. This does not mean cutting magazines, or at least not cutting as many magazines as you may think. No, it is all about reducing the amount of space allocated to magazines.

Here are the steps I recommend newsagents take. They are steps I have followed for years in my own newsagencies. They are steps I have recommended to others with success.

  1. Relay your magazines. Get the right layout for your business. This is the appropriate next step as the work itself reacquaints you with what you sell. Click here for my updated advice on how to do a magazine relay.
  2. Reduce space used. In some title categories of your magazine department you will be able to fit more than one magazine per pocket. You may fit three magazine titles into two pockets or five titles into three. Every pocket saved is space you could use for something else. Here are examples of categories where I have seen this work:
    1. Woodworking.
    2. Model trains.
    3. Trains / planes / boats.
    4. Special interest auto.
    5. Special interest sport.
    6. Special interest music.
    7. British weekly.
    8. British monthly.
    9. Fringe fashion.
    10. Intellectual.
  3. Decide how many magazine pockets you will cut. Do this by running a Magazine Sell Through rates report. Titles with a sell through of less than 40% ought to be up for consideration to be cut. You decide your cutoff point based on your business needs. Be thoughtful in your process. Do not approach this task with anger.
  4. Decide other changes for magazines. The report you produce in the above step will also show top selling magazine titles. Use this data to chase a sales increase. Leverage the positive information for your commercial advantage.
  5. Do not try and do everything at once. Expect to cut space several times. For example, if you have 1,200 pockets today and you have 500 titles with a sell through of 40% or less, cut 300 pockets in your first go. Do this, measure over several months, plan then consider doing it again.
  6. Advise the magazine distributors. Write to each distributor on your business letterhead advising them you have cut magazine pockets by xxx. Be specific on the number of pockets and the percentage of space cut – this is important. Advise that the change has been made. Ask they immediately cut the number of titles by the same percentage as your cut. Ask for them to acknowledge the letter. Fax the letter and post in an Express Post envelope – keep the tracking number of the envelope.
  7. Watch your supply. If, after three weeks, there is no reduction, send another letter with a  copy of your earlier letter.
  8. Watch your supply II. If, after a further three weeks there is no reduction, act by making a complaint to your local Small Business Commissioner. Request mediation. Explain the steps you have taken and why you have taken. Ask for their intervention.
  9. Consider legal action. Consider using VCAT, QCAT or a similar state based tribunal to have your complaint adjudicated. This action will force mediation. Note: it is at this point that most newsagents will give up, preferring to complain than following a process to the end. Taking the matter to a tribunal is vital if you want to demonstrate you are serious in your endeavour.
  10. Use the new space. There is no point in cutting unprofitable magazine space unless you have a plan to use it for something else. You should not start work on the list I have documented here unless you have a valuable use for the space you will free in your business.

Despite what the magazine distributors might say, you have control over the magazine space you pay for. The process outlined here, while time consuming, provides the distributors with a visibility of data about your business on which they must act if they are ethical in how they run their business.

I urge you to give them the benefit of the doubt embedded in these processes. I am confident that if you follow the processes I have outlined you will achieve reduction. It may take some extra steps or duo ling of work – but it will work.

Keep your communication civil. Be clear that you do not want to quit magazines altogether. Outline your cost base and that unless the change you seek is brought about your business is under broader pressure on its very survival.

Magazines are important in any newsagency. The million dollar question is how many magazines? I think that number is currently somewhere between 600 and 700 titles. I am confident this figure is understood by key people in magazine publishing and distribution. Thanks to the work outlined here you can fit 700 titles today in the space you would have used for 1,000 titles previously.

The difficulty right now is that we newsagents are agitating for more efficient supply while magazine distributors are operating with some publisher contracts that hark back to a time when there was less pressure on the issue of oversupply.

There is no shortcut to this process, no way to avoid the work of the steps above. Sure, there is a time commitment. It is your business. You need to invest in its future. Complaining about having no time takes time away from getting the work done. get on with it – pursue the one goal of achieving a lower overhead cost for magazines in your business.

What do you think? Let me know. Also, let me know if you need help.

To publishers: if you read this and worry about your title, my advice is only worry if your title is supplied at a volume that makes it unprofitable for newsagents. The equation is simple really – oversupply and your title is more likely to be cut … as it should be.

To the ANF: Where are you in all this? Lost at sea, preferring to hop behind publishers and distributors without offering critical analysis and professional thought to practical steps newsagents can take.

26 likes
magazine distribution

Do you check for magazine returns discrepancies in your newsagency?

When you scan magazine returns, your newsagency software should provide to you a report listing discrepancies between the magazines you scanned for return and what your newsagency software thinks are to be returned based on arrival and scanned sales data.

Do you check your discrepancy report?

Checking the discrepancy report is a basic newsagency management task. In a few seconds you can see if you are returning all magazines due to be returned. The report also highlights for you magazines that may have been stolen. This last insight is important with theft accounting for between 2% and 5% of product revenue in a typical newsagency business.

It frustrates me when I am asked to help newsagents deal with a magazine returns problem and discover they do not regularly check for discrepancies between what they should return and have scanned for return. In these instances these newsagents have operated in ignorance by not checking the accuracy of their returns.

One I spoke with recently said their returns were being done properly. It turns out they were;t being done properly. Checking the discrepancy report would have highlighted this when it happened rather than using the report after the event to support the claim back to the newsagent that they were managing the returns process incorrectly.

Scanning returns is simple. The overall magazine returns process is equally simple. That said, people do make mistakes. Time pressures, poor training of new employees, tack interruptions, ignorance and other factors can lead to the scanning of returns being incomplete or wrong.

Laziness about the technology itself – hardware, software status and internet connection – can also play a role in returns not being processed accurately and to the level of compliance required by XchangeIT and through to the magazine distributors.

Given the long established standards overseen by XchangeIT and their process of compliance over the accredited newsagency software companies it is hard to get it wrong, hard to fail at returns processing but fail some newsagents do.

I think all of us who work with newsagents on the management of their businesses need to revisit the basics, we need to help them get these everyday tasks right, to lift the quality of business performance and reduce the occurrences of mistakes as every mistake has time and cost consequences not only for newsagent businesses but also for supplier businesses.

I appreciate this is a long winded blog post. Please, take a moment to check that your magazine returns processes are best practice.

14 likes
magazine distribution

Disappointed at Lovatts low-margin adult colouring title

lov-colLovatts has entered the adult colouring space with Inklings. They are late. Adult colouring took off ten months ago. While I didn’t receive the title other newsagents have and they needed to find space in full magazine departments. They also had to deal with yet another low margin title in a category from which we can easily earn 50% gross profit.

Newsagents with the title will be frustrated to know Lovatts has placed the title in supermarkets.

Smart newsagents want adult colouring titles through which they can leverage a point of difference over supermarkets. This is where book and art supply suppliers help us.

Magazine publishers need to not be overloading newsagents in this already full segment.

13 likes
magazine distribution

Symply Too Good supply model frustrating newsagents

For years, newsagents supported Annette Sym’s Symply Too Good cookbooks, carrying them on the shelves for long periods of time, often barely covering real estate and labour costs – if they were lucky.

This week newsagents received new supply of Symply Too Good cookbook. Many are frustrated with the long on sale, the long period of delayed billing and that there was no opt in, no ability for the newsagent to control the spending of their money.

Some newsagents have noted they received an opt out email with 48 hours to act. If true, the 48 hour response time is ridiculous. Other newsagents have said they received no such email.

Given today’s retail real estate and labour costs, only an opt in process is appropriate. Further, the on-sale ought to be optional from 30 days with no delayed billing. These rules would respect newsagents whereas the model being used now does not.

Magazine space in newsagencies is under more pressure than ever. We all need to cut space and labour costs. This leaves less space for slow performing titles. It means we have no room for long on-sale titles. Publishers need to understand this, they need to respect us.

Footnote: Annette Sym will be unhappy at this post. It is important to unpack the facts from a range of newsagents before responding. For example, with the retail space a magazine pocket takes in a shopping centre newsagency costing anything from $1 to $3 a week, return on space is a key metric. The low margin from magazines and the low volume of niche titles like these demand they be under the spotlight when assessing magazine performance. The numbers themselves have us looking at the performance of the Symply Too Good titles no matter how much we like them.

16 likes
Magazine oversupply

Frustration with IPS

IMG_8814 (1)I like Forge magazine but I do not like that I get four copies when I only need 2 and that I have to keep it on the shelves longer than viable given the cost of the space it occupies.

It is tough and often unprofitable work being a magazine specialist.

6 likes
magazine distribution

Updated advice on doing a magazine relay in your newsagency

In the three years since I published my article How to do a magazine relay in your newsagency plenty has changed. In this post I provide up to date advice. I hope you find it useful.

Before you start the relay, consider the amount of space you want to allocate to magazines. Do not allocate space to fit what you are sent. Allocate space to make money.

Today’s newsagency needs somewhere between 15% and 25% of floor space allocated for magazines. With the category one of the least valuable in pure gross profit terms efficient use of space is key.

Once you have your floor space allocation and know your fixture situation you will have a pocket count.

Now you can get down to your relay.

The relay you do in your business is your relay. There is no right or wrong way. There is also no end point. What you do today will need refining next week and the week after. So, do not over think what you want to do as that would be a waste of time.

The goal of the relay has to be to disrupt magazine traffic in pursuit of an increase in sales. What I mean is: change everything, upset customers and staff, sell more magazines as people discover titles they did not know you had.

PLANNING

Determine your zones shopper: garden, food, men, women, sports etc. In some locations you will full face titles while in other locations you will fit three titles into two pockets and in others as many as six titles into two pockets. The categories where I use less than one pocket per title is: special interest, British weeklies, food, comics and some craft segments.

Yes, customers looking for a destination title for which you receive a small quantity will look for the title. Save money, use less space for these titles.

Look at the percentage of sales delivered by each magazine category and look at sales trends for the categories.  Tote up broad groups. For example the percentage of sales for women’s weeklies, women’s interests, crafts & hobbies, crosswords, home & lifestyle and food & wine.  If your newsagency is like mine, this grouping will account for more than 50% of your magazine sales.

Use your data to broadly map out a plan.

NOW, THE MAGAZINE RELAY

I suggest it is done by one person, an owner, working alone.

  1. Take every magazine off the shelves. That’s right. If you are going to do this you have to commit and taking every magazine off the shelves is a commitment.  Also, take down all magazine posters.
  2. Clean the shelves. What an opportunity!
  3. Build the women’s zone. From the busiest section in.  If it is an aisle, start with women’s weeklies on one side and fashion (marie claire, Cleo, Cosmo, Vogue) on the other.  Concentrate on one side first, the weeklies.  Respect top sellers, give New Idea, Women’s Day, Famous, NW, Who, OK!, That’s Life and Take 5 prime position.
  4. Place a half or full column of crossword titles next to the weeklies.
  5. Next to weeklies place, in order, pockets of Better Homes and Gardens followed by Australian Women’s Weekly, British women’s magazines (yes, all of them), country living titles, home and living titles, food, wedding with a waterfall of the major title and hair.  For me, space wise, that sees out one side of the aisle.
  6. On the opposite side, directly across from and facing women’s weeklies, I have fashion young, fashion older and I end this with a waterfall of Frankie.  Next is women’s health starting with younger target titles and blending to older ones. Next is pregnancy and baby followed by crosswords. This usually rounds out that side.
  7. This is my women’s aisle.
  8. Using key titles as borders and features at the same time.
  9. I look for one space on each side for an in-location display, where I take between four and six pockets for a poster supporting a title.  This can ease the visual conflict of a mass of titles and drive incremental business for a good title to boot.

What I do in women’s is the same for the other zones I create.  I do each zone separately and try and get into the head space of the shopper of the zone – using the most popular titles to act as beacons, or signposts, for the zone.

I also take note of covers and give really good covers, eye catching covers, time in the spotlight.

I am careful what I place next to top selling titles. This is a prime spot, next to the popular titles. Choose wisely. Choose titles that naturally fit next to the big titles, titles shoppers are likely to browse and purchase on impulse.

If I am not sure about where to put a title I put it aside and move on.

I take extra time with special interest and hobby titles.  For example, I put railways and model railroad titles near each other but I am careful to ensure that they are separated as they appeal to two shoppers and only occasionally do you see titles from both segments in the same basket.

Within the zones I look for and respect specialisation. For example, within men’s lifestyle and sports I create a clean space for the quality serious fitness titles like Coach, Men’s Health and Men’s Fitness.

REVIEW, FEEDBACK, FOLLOW UP

You’re not done when you think you are done. Track sales, listen to your team and your customers. Tweak where you feel it is necessary.

Bring new issues to the fore. Continue to be engaged in how your magazine department looks.

Continue to look at your sales data.  If there is no lift be open to further change.

FINAL WORDS

Doing a magazine relay can be like doing one of those kid’s puzzles – you move them around and around until you have the completed image. That image can look and feel like a work of art once you are done.

I can’t stress enough the importance and value of a magazine relay to your business and you personally. This is you placing your stamp on the business.  It is you breaking free from being a conveyer belt newsagent. It is you taking ownership of your business.

If you have made it this far, thanks for reading.  Magazines really are a point of difference which we need to work harder at embracing – despite the challenges of the distribution system.

I’d be happy to answer questions or discuss magazine relays with anyone: mark@towersystems.com.au or 0418 321 338.

Over to you…

6 likes
magazine distribution

Overloaded with Hooray magazine by Network Services

IMG_8417The magazine allocations gurus at Network Services have outdone themselves sending us more than double our supply of Hooray magazine without evidence of us selling out.

What a waste of time, paper and money. It makes a mockery of their claims to the ACCC that they want to help newsagents make money from magazines. Their actions continue to fail to live up to their words.

Click on the image and see the ridiculousness of the situation.

Screen Shot 2015-07-16 at 12.59.07 pmI did a search on the Hooray website to see who else nearby has the title. Sure enough, it is everywhere. I wonder if Network has overloaded my competitors?

If I was the only retailer with the title I would feel better about more stock but with these other outlets nearby why on earth send double the quantity when there is nothing special about this issue.

7 likes
magazine distribution

Monocle editor responds to reporting on his comments about newsagents

Please see below comment from Tyler Brûlé, editor in chief of Monocle in response to comments attributed to him by B&T and commented on by me here.

As Australia is one of our most important markets (third biggest in the world) it’s clear that that most in the trade do a very good job and it’s hardly in our interest to criticise an important franchise of independents who’ve been critical to our growth. You will note that the headline in B&T does not reflect the content of what was said in the interview. The point being made is that everyone in the magazine distribution has to work hard at innovating and we cannot simply blame all things digital for this industry’s woes. Just as magazines have to deliver good editorial and outstanding covers, paper companies need to keep innovating with stock, distributors need to deliver on time and retailers need to keep pace with shop designs that are welcoming and encourage consumers to linger and spend more.

The comment was provided to me last night in an email discussion with and started by the Communications Director for Monocle. The discussion was useful. I made this point:

Our channel is made up of around 4,000 small businesses.  We have no control over the magazines we receive. We make 25% gross profit off each magazine we sell.  More than 5o% of magazines sent to us are unsold and have to be returned at our cost.

For most newsagents, magazines are a break even service at best.  For decades we have fought for terms which would allow us to compete with massive supermarkets but have been unsuccessful.  This is why newsagents are reducing their commitment to magazines.

I accept that the reporting may not be what was intended – a point made by the Director of Communications in one email:

I wanted to drop you a quick note regarding your blog and your post yesterday re: Tyler’s interview in B&T Weekly.  We woke up to see the dramatic headline that B&T Weekly had chosen and were disappointed.

Australia is our third biggest market and we have invested a lot of time in both visiting newsagencies and finding ways to work with newsagencies more effectively.  It’s very important to us.

We also want to make it clear that Tyler was commenting on some newsagents, not all newsagents. Some are brilliant. Some are not so great.

The point we were actually trying to make is that ‘the internet’ is not the only problem when discussing the future of newspapers. It’s the entire chain – paper companies, retailers, transport, prices – as well as the environment you buy them in.

1 likes
magazine distribution

Why all the posts today about Network Services?

The posts I have published today reflect data from one newsagency. The newsagent sent me the screen shots as evidence of the appalling oversupply they are suffering and have been suffering from Bauer’s Network Services.

While the company reps say one thing to the ACCC and have the ANF under their spell, the company does this month after month to small business newsagents.

No wonder newsagents continue to scream abut oversupply.

No study is needed to stop tis behaviour y Bauer. They are in control.

16 likes
Ethics

Network Services overloads newsagents with Motor magazine

photo 5Look at this evidence of Network Services increasing supply of Motor magazine to a newsagent without any justification in the sales data. Network is owned by Bauer. Bauer representatives told the ACCC recently that they want to support newsagents and help newsagents grow their businesses.  The actions from Bauer indicate something different. No wonder newsagents early return.

Shame on Bauer.

10 likes
magazine distribution

Network Services overloads newsagents with Harpers Bazzar magazine

photo 4Look at this evidence of Network Services increasing supply of Harpers Bazzar magazine to a newsagent without any justification in the sales data. Network is owned by Bauer. Bauer representatives told the ACCC recently that they want to support newsagents and help newsagents grow their businesses.  The actions from Bauer indicate something different. No wonder newsagents early return.

Shame on Bauer.

10 likes
magazine distribution