A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

Ethics

Support for the convenience channel over newsagents

I am concerned about the move by some suppliers to support the convenience channel over the newsagency channel.  In Victoria, for example, Myki (transport tickets) were available in 7-Eleven ahead of newsagents and now Myki tickets feature in 7-Eleven ads.  Tatts completed a direct to point of sale integration with 7-Eleven when they told me that they could not do any such integration because the government agreement precluded it.

It is concerning to see 7-Eleven get such arrangements in place ahead of newsagents. We were the natural home of each of these products.  Now, 7-Eleven has a better and more relevant offer for convenience shoppers. This, coupled with their significant expansion in fuel, makes them our strongest competitor in this convenience space.

In the magazine space 7-Eleven is ahead of us too. They have control over their product mix and quantity.  I suspect they are paid a promotion fee for counter offers.

In the telco recharge space I suspect they are treated differently too but I con’t be sure.  Better margin maybe?  Rebates?  I am confident they are on a deal with Apple on their vouchers.

Does any of this matter? That depends on whether you see your newsagency as a convenience business or a destination store.  I’ll be covering this fundamental question in the Newsagency of the Future series.

12 likes
Ethics

Politicians fail newsagents and all small business retailers

Julia Gillard says that only the Labor party will protect workers and keep in place penalty rates in place and protected with new laws.

Tony Abbott says the government should be replaced immediately yet he is offering no insight into how he would govern other than some slogans. He appears unwilling to pursue an equitable solution on the issue of penalty rates.

I am all for penalty rates where working on a particular day or at a particular time is a penalty. Like today, Good Friday – penalty rates should apply. Or even Easter Sunday.

Regular Saturdays and Sundays, they should attract no penalty rate.  This is what the politicians need to address. If Tony Abbott did address this he could expect more small business support. As it stands, there appears to be no real difference between the parties on what is a very important issue.

In the meantime, we are stuck with paying around $40 an hour for what is reasonably unskilled work at a time that suits those taking the weekend work.

My frustration is compounded by the knowledge that in the US, retailers pay under $10 an hour any day of the week. I don’t want to change the base to that level.  In fact, I don’t want to change the base at all.  What I do want is weekend penalty rates abolished. Such a move would be socially responsible.

13 likes
Ethics

Why media companies should not be listened to on media reform

I am disappointed that politicians are listening to media companies about media reform. Here is another issue where the voters are ignored in favour of conflicted special interest groups. One only has to look at how the media companies are reporting on reform to see why at the very least a public interest advocate is a good thing.

These media companies have a vested interest – profit. The reform is about a balanced media we can trust. Trust is not part of the profit equation.

Every time I see another story about a media owner or manager lobbying a politician I wonder why smokers don’t get to lobby on tobacco or fat people on food laws or communities on fracking. Hang on, the companies that stand to profit get to do the lobbying.

Politicians go where the money is for counsel. Media companies go where the money is on lobbying.

The reporting of the debate on media reform in and of itself demonstrates the need for reform.  The sad thins is that many Australians will not see this as they have been told otherwise – by some of the media companies most in need of more oversight.

11 likes
Ethics

How can you price compare when other retailers don’t have the products you have Officeworks?

I received an Officeworks catalogue at my home on the weekend and went to check their ink price against ours. The few ink products listed were value packs. Most I’d not seen before.  It’s possible that Officeworks has products exclusively for a period and that their price, for such a period, would always be the lowest as it would be the only price. If this is the case, Officeworks should tag the product as exclusive so shoppers know they can’t price compare.

Why does this matter? Officeworks make a big deal about having the lowest prices and that they themselves regularly price compare. This can’t be done for products they have exclusively.

I’d love the see Choice do some work on this. Better still, maybe the ACCC could look at it given their renewed interest in the supermarket duopoly.

The Officeworks catalogue says they do price checks twice a day to make sure they are the cheapest. This work is easier if some of the products are exclusive to them.

Australians think newsagency businesses are expensive. This is in part due to the advertising might of our major competitors like the supermarkets of which Officeworks is part.

10 likes
Ethics

Cynicism in media regulation arguments

It’s interesting to see the media companies get into a lather about the possibility of more regulation when some of these companies have refused to give newsagents an operational environment of less regulation. They have self determination today and reject the creation of a new office to advocate public interest yet they have been happy to leave us in a high regulated state with little control and a model that is competitively disadvantageous to most we compete with.

10 likes
Ethics

Offensive front page from The Daily Telegraph

I am offended by the front page of The Daily Telegraph today. That they are using their newspaper to run a commercially interested political agenda with little regard for facts is bad enough but to suggest Stephen Conroy is the same as Robert Mugabe, Stalin and others is offensive. It is evidence of the lengths to which News will go to get its own way. News can’t be objective on this issue so they have tossed out even trying to look objective.

The sad thing is that so many people rely on The Daily Telegraph for their news … and they vote. The role of a newspaper is to report news, not seek to influence public opinion based on mistruths.

The kind of bias demonstrated by The Daily Telegraph reminds me of media coverage I have seen in government controlled media in China and Vietnam in the last year.

For a more balanced perspective on the issue, check out an excellent piece at The Conversation by Martin Hurst from Deakin University.

7 likes
Ethics

Book supplier Hinkler disrespects newsagents in Woolworths Naplan move

Newsagents who took on the Naplan educational book range from book distributor Hinkler have been surprised to see the same range at Woolworths check-outs at a 10% discount.

Had they been told Woolworths would stock the Naplan books, newsagents I have spoken with have told me that they would not have taken on the product.  It’s my view that Hinkler has disrespected newsagents by not disclosing the Woolworths move.

As Australia’s supermarket duopoly push more into our space – and they will – suppliers to newsagents who also supply the supermarkets need to be up front with us about their arrangements and plans with supermarkets. To sell to newsagents without disclosure will see their products dumped and, sometimes, alternative products sourced.

Our channel is different to supermarkets. We offer a value-based service whereas the supermarkets usually only compete on price. In pursuing their price strategy they disrespect brands. Suppliers who care about their brands will focus more on newsagents and less on supermarkets.

Yes, we attract different shoppers, but they are not ad different between newsagents and supermarkets as they are, for example, between newsagents and deep discount stores.

What Hinkler has done to newsagents with this Naplan range sucks.

17 likes
Book retailing

How efficient are traffic drivers for your business?

I newsagent colleague shared product efficiency data with me earlier this week which showed that shoppers purchasing transport tickets purchased nothing else 84% of the time.  This is in a business with excellent up-sell opportunities in place at the counter and excellent, engaging, customer service.

5% of transactions included a newspaper. Only .3% of the time did customers purchase anything with a margin close to 50%.

As the margin on transport tickets has been driven down by state governments (of all political sides), newsagents have stayed in the game in the hope that the traffic generated by offering transport tickets translates into add-on business.

The newsagent reporting that 84% of transport ticket sales are for tickets alone is not unique. Indeed, this figure for alone sales is low compared to others I have seen – some are as high as 94%!

On first glance it is easy to argue that transport tickets are not efficient and that we do need to assess their value on the margin made from the tickets and not from the hop of selling something else to the customer. However, we also need to consider whether the transport ticket customer will remember us when they do want something else and come back in and purchase other items.

My view is that transport ticket shoppers are blinkered when they need a ticket or a transport card top-up and that it is unlikely they will think of us when they want a card, a gift or something else. They usually get transport related products from us because it’s convenient when using public transport. That’s the mindset they have when coming to us. They’d be in a different mindset when shopping at a more leisurely pace.

I do not believe suppliers of low margin products and services when they say that we will benefit from the traffic they generate for us. This is an argument we need to challenge as there is no data I can see to support such a case.

Okay, I am no psychologist with insights into the minds of shoppers, not even close. But I do watch shoppers and I listen to them. I suspect that many buying a transport ticket don’t even know what else we sell. I suspect most would not think of us when they do want to buy the other items we’d like to sell them.

So we come to the question: are these slim margin products (anything with a margin of 6% or less) worth it to us? This is a complex question we can only answer for our own businesses considering our own circumstances. It’s a question newsagents need to ask themselves. They need to make a thorough assessment based on their own business data and considering future plans for their business.

For me, my newsagency businesses are less interested in these slim margin traffic generators than we are in lower volume, high margin, more sustained products and services that we have more personal control over – products and services so valued by customers that they will seek us out.

13 likes
Ethics

Frivolous fun on a Saturday

I played with our AFL Beanie Kids display to reflect the drugs cloud currently hanging over the Essendon Football Club. It was a bit of nonsense fun but couldn’t get it right so I put the display back. I was looking for represent the Essendon mascots as drug enhanced compared to their competitors – like the upstanding Carlton.

Don’t tell the boss I was goofing off.

3 likes
Ethics

Is it time newsagents ceased as directors of newsagent-owned enterprises?

Newsagents sit on the boards of various businesses supplying newsagents including stationery wholesalers and associations. While I am sure they discharge their duties to the best of their ability, it is appropriate to consider whether newsagents are the best directors of these business enterprises.

Newsagent owned businesses, and associations conducting commercial activity to newsagents, operate in a commercial world quite different to a newsagency – distribution or retail. This is why I question why newsagents make the best directors.

Directors are usually paid fees for their time. Are they worth it ? Are their decisions adding value to the businesses? Are the boards they sit on performing well? Would they get a gig on the board of a competitor business?

I know from my own experience on the ANF board in 2003/04 that newsagents bring personal baggage to the boardroom table. I saw a lack of commercial savvy and a disinterest in due diligence and transparency.  Bill Express is a perfect example of a bad decision by directors ill-equipped to make the decision. Before I resigned I expressed concern at the excess of the ANF Board meeting bar tab – a 45 minute fight ensued which I lost. They spent more time arguing about this than matters of serious commercial consequence for newsagents.

I have other stories I could share of my own and from others. If only newsagents knew.

Boards ought to be focused on big picture issues, setting direction and holding the employees of the organisations to account. Too often that is not the case, giving the competitors a free kick and wasting member and shareholder funds along the way.

These newsagent owned commercial enterprises collectively turn over well over $100 million a year.

Isn’t it time we populated the boards with quality commercial directors as competitors of these businesses do?

19 likes
Ethics

Is Big W dishonest in claiming they offer Australia’s lowest prices?

Big W has a catalogue out now in which they are promoting ink under the headline of Australia’s lowest prices. The problem for the company is that all their ink prices are not the lowest prices. Some maybe, but not all, not even half. Within a few minutes of checking competitor prices Big W would see that their prices are not the lowest.

While those of us beating Big W on ink and other prices can complain to the ACCC, history has shown that the corporate watchdog is less that strident in pursuing what I would call false and misleading advertising.

Small businesses, like newsagents, suffer from the marketing spend by national price-focused retailers like Big W. The Big W pitch appears to be built on the premise say something loud and long enough and people will believe it, regardless of whether the statement has any truth to it.

Politicians can show the strength of their commitment to small businesses by supporting us on this type of big business campaign that they beat others on price. It’s cheap, lazy and an affront to the small businesses that can’t afford to show that often times they (we) are actually cheaper.

Every newsagent selling ink should get their hands on the latest Big W catalogue and compare prices. If you are cheaper, tell your customers – through a big poster in-store or in the window and over the counter.

This is just like the recent Officeworks claim. They don’t have the lowest prices everyday despite what they claim.

Newsagents who can prove that Big W’s current ink prices are not the lowest in Australia should complain to the ACCC. Click here for addresses and contact points.

10 likes
Ethics

Visiting other newsagencies

I’d be interested in how newsagents go about visiting other newsagencies.  Do you make an appointment?  Do you identify yourself in-store?  Do you ask before taking photos?  Do you share feedback to their face or behind their back?

Newsagents can learn a lot from each other … fresh eyes and all that. The owner of the store being visited can also share insights and explanations that could provide a better understanding of what is seen.

Partly because of what I write here, my newsagencies have been visited many times over the years. I appreciate the courtesy of an appointment. I appreciate being asked if photos can be taken. What I don’t like is the people who talk about what they saw (or think they saw) behind your back without the courtesy of even telling you they were in your shop.

What’s your experience?

8 likes
Ethics

Newsagent suppliers concerned about data grab

Several newsagent suppliers have expressed serious concerns about the move by For Arts Sake to syphon off all sales data for use by the company outside the participating newsagency.

My understanding is that FAS is saying it will provide business analysis. I think that is a ruse since good newsagency software provides this to newsagents today and has done for many years.

The real value for FAS from what I can see is that they themselves could monetise this commercially sensitive business data. Newsagents considering engaging need to be very careful.

The question remains about the contractual obligations of newsagents to not share data relating to some suppliers. The terms and conditions invite such questions.

FAS is working hard to grab a bigger share of the greeting card space in newsagencies. My view is it should work on its brand. The most valuable shoppers are those committed to a brand. Ask customers which card brand they recognise the most.

3 likes
Basket building

News Limited favours new retailers over newsagents in its Valentine’s Day promotion

News Limited has emailed newsagents in NSW, asking them to promote the Valentine’s Day edition of The Daily Telegraph to other retailers on terms not available to retail newsagents.

This move disadvantages retail newsagents. It is a disrespectful move by News because of the trading terms advantage given to these other retailers and by chasing sales outside the well-established and loyal newsagency channel.

In this year of extraordinary change driven by News and their T2020 project, they should be more sensitive toward newsagents than ever. This move goes against the spirit of support for newsagents the company has been espousing when promoting T2020.

Here is the email from News:

VALENTINE’S DAY DAILY TELEGRAPH OFFER

Attached is a Valentine’s Day Daily Telegraph offer to help you increase sales on the day.

Valentine’s Day falls on a Thursday this year.

Please approach all florists, restaurants or any small businesses in your area that would be interested in taking up the offer:

 50-99 x The Daily Telegraph @ $0.75 per unit (cost saving 37%)

 100-199 x The Daily Telegraph @ $0.65 per unit (cost saving 46%)

 200+ x The Daily Telegraph @ $0.50 per unit (cost saving 58%)

If you would like me to print off any flyers for you, just let me know. All orders need to sent back before Feb 6th.

Several newsagents who have contacted me have expressed their disgust at this move.

It’s an issue newsagents might consider taking to the ACCC. While the ACCC will question the consumer impact, newsagents could explain that it is moves like this that make newsagencies less profitable and could add to the closure of businesses. It would also be reasonable to question why a florist should get up to 58% GP when a retail newsagent will get anything from 12.5% to 25%. We could also argue that this is an abuse of market power by News.

If News Limited wants retail newsagents to support its products it ought to urgently reconsider this Valentine’s Day promotion. Either it gives retail newsagents the same terms or it withdraws the offer to florists and others.

News Limited needs to prove to us that its words of support for newsagents in 2012, through its T2020 presentations, were real and that we can trust the company.

18 likes
Ethics

Silly games by politicians about living on the dole

It’s been disappointing watching politicians of all sides engaging in games on whether they could live on the Newstart allowance for a week. It’s typically ignorant of them to play these games. Media outlets run with the stories and the community remains poorly served.

Politicians who really want to empathise with and understand the challenges of their constituents would walk in the shoes of others for more than a week.

Take a small business like a local newsagency, a politician who wanted to understand our situation would live and work as a newsagent for at least a month. I am confident that such an internship would result in better small business policy.

I am not talking about a contest here, to see if they can make it. No, I want something more valuable, something real which they remember when they next consider small business issues.

They need to understand the challenges of government regulation, banking, retail tenancy, employees and competition – especially with the supermarket duopoly. Understanding can only come with them delving into the business. A ten minute photo opportunity may look good on TV or in the newspapers but it does not give them a lasting memory of what small business constituents go through every day.

Politicians of all sides have failed small business for decades. In 2013 I’d like to see genuine engagement in pursuit of genuine respect for one of the most important business sectors in Australia.

11 likes
Ethics

Politicians should block acquisitions by Coles and Woolworths

Just before Christmas there was discussion in the media about work between Coles, Woolworths and the ACCC on the oversight and regulation of their purchases of independent retailers. At the time, the ACCC Chair said they needed to watch for market power of the two supermarket giants.

Huh?! By any measure overseas, Coles and Woolworths already have too much market power.  Farmers, wholesalers, independent retailers, logistics companies – many complain about the bullying of these two on price. The only winners are the shareholders of the two and while that is good for them, the economic damage of their market share is considerable.

Politicians concerned about small businesses and having a strong and balanced economy should legislate to stop Coles and Woolworths. Politicians concerned for the Australian voice to be heard through high street retail ought to legislate to stop Coles and Woolworths.

But politicians won’t act. When it comes to these matters they are all words and no action.

Without legislation, the ACCC is powerless in this area as time has shown.

20 likes
Ethics

Newsagents not put in a good light in A Current Affair story

Several people have contacted me to say that newsagents were not fairly portrayed in a story on A Current Affair on Wednesday night.

I did not see the story so cannot comment.

On YouTube you can see a video posted earlier this year which was apparently mentioned on A Current Affair and partly played in the story they aired. Read the comments posted on YouTube following the airing of the story.

I have posted this here today for anyone who wants to comment. I’d be particularly interested in comments on the ACA approach.

The work involved in crediting customers for the non delivery of a newspaper for a day like Christmas Day is easy with most newsagency software.

3 likes
Ethics

Wary of For Arts Sake loyalty program for newsagents

The terms and conditions of the loyalty program being launched by For Arts Sake indicate that newsagents need to have broadband and install a device to feed scanned sales data of items sold to FAS.

All data goes to FAS.  This could breach supplier agreements including magazine agreements. It could also give FAS data about a business that the business may not want FAS to get.  I suggest newsagents get professional advice before signing.

Basket data is valuable to newsagents. The moment they allow basket data to leave their business the opportunity for them to leverage value is diminished.

A device like this was mooted with newsagents five or so years ago. It was knocked on the head then because of the same data and contractual issues.

The email from FAS promoting the opportunity gushes. It includes…

No other supplier in the Newsagent industry has ever developed such a program to help support and grow their retailers business.

This is the BIGGEST opportunity for Newsagents since Lotto was introduced in 1974.

My experience is that both statements are not accurate. Caveat emptor.

11 likes
Ethics

Newsagents abused by Gordon and Gotch

Magazine publishers who wonder why newsagents early return their titles should read this.  Some newsagents received these toys from Gordon and Gotch on Monday.

Yeah, a magazine distributor has sent newsagents these Shoulder Buddies for sale at 25% GP. Newsagents get 50% and more GP on toys so why would they offer these for less?  There is no obvious or promoted magazine link.

So close to Christmas with shops already brimming with stock – who at Gotch approved this? Who has treated newsagents this way?  The Gotch leadership owes newsagents an explanation.

This is an appalling abuse of the newsagency channel by Gordon and Gotch. Gotch should not distribute toys. Newsagents have many toy suppliers at their disposal and the ability to achieve 50% (and more) GP.

No wonder 50% of newsagents are reducing magazine space in-store. Most feel that this is the only way they can control supply.

I would not be surprised if some newsagents struck out at Gotch and early returned magazines in punishment against Gotch. Yes, I understand such  move could be crazy … but think about how abused some newsagents will feel.

Footnote: I did  not receive this product in any of my stores.

12 likes
Ethics

Beware offers of lease negotiation help

A range of people and organisations offer to help newsagents with lease negotiation. I urge newsagents to do their research before signing on with any party making such an offer.

Ask for recent references and do your own research.

One newsagent recently found that the party they were paying to represent them was negotiating for another party to take their lease and business.

It is one thing to face a competition head on and another entirely when your own ‘family’ is stabbing you in the back.

Bottom line: when it comes to lease help, do due diligence and ensure that claims being made are truthful.

3 likes
Ethics

I’d be surprised if Coles paid to advertise Woman’s Day

The Herald Sun and the Daily Telegraph today have quarter page ads promoting the special issue of Woman’s Day as available from Coles supermarkets.

I doubt Coles paid for these ads.

My understanding is that Coles product advertising is funded by suppliers. I guess ACP paid for the ad.  If true, shame on ACP for treating their retail channels differently and for ignoring newsagents, their most valuable retail channel.

I can see why Coles would have asked for funding – because ACP wanted them to do something beyond the usual with the weekly title. Whereas newsagents will invest their own time and space in these special issues, supermarkets only engage if they are compensated for what they consider to be extra work.

I’d love ACP to comment on this.

14 likes
Ethics

Some newsagents can be challenging customers

As a newsagent and a supplier to newsagents I get to see our channel in action from a range of perspectives. While most engagement I encounter between newsagents and suppliers is positive and respectful, there is the rare occasion of a bad experience and, of course, it’s the experience you remember the most.

Some newsagents, very few in fact, are quick with threats against suppliers if they do not get what they want. They will say that they will tell every other newsagent that your product or service is bad unless you give them what they want. Or they will say they will complain to the association in an effort to have you accede to their request – even if the request is outside your documented trading terms.

It’s my experience that the scope and volume of the threat is the inverse of the facts of the situation. The few times I have seen or heard of this type of blackmail behaviour – I’ll hurt your company unless you give me what I want – the threats started before the dispute was even investigated and the newsagent is seeking something they to which they are not entitled – hence the over the top threats.

I experienced a situation recently, a newsagent emailed me about an issue. I said I was overseas but would rely on my person on the ground to look into it. Minutes later, they replied with an email saying they would never deal with my company again and had reported the matter to the association.  The matter had not yet been investigated at my level and the amount in question was fractional compared to the decades-long relationship. They exploded too early and all because I wanted to research their complaint. The matter was complicated by them making the small purchase agreeing to the terms and conditions and the supply meeting these.

There was no other issue between us, no other history other than positive.

Because of their threat I decided to give them what they wanted.  I know of other suppliers who have done the same in similar circumstances. We do it because ours is a gossip-fuelled channel where baseless gossip can harm reputations. I understand that giving in feeds the monster. It’s a judgement call that suppliers do all too often find to be necessary … unfortunately. We did this time.

Why write about this? To show that newsagent suppliers from time to time have to deal with situations that the vast majority of newsagents would never know about and to point out that a very small number of newsagents give the broader community a bad name. I also write about this to explain why some suppliers have complex account application and purchase processes.

10 likes
Ethics

What to make of the Leveson report in the UK

The release of the report of the Leveson Inquiry has UK newspapers saying they don’t need the control measures outlined in the report. A tragedy has been uncovered brought about by systematic and systemic crime and corruption and the plan for stopping this happening again is being rejected because businesses think they can control themselves. Self regulation failed the UK.

We have seen similar complaints in Australia following the Finklestein report into media regulation. News outlets don’t want regulation, they say it’s censorship.  We have censorship in Australia today in some media outlets and bias on show in their pages. Look at global warming – many media outlets do not report the facts.  Just this week with the AWU scandal we have seen media outlets take down spin in the face of evidence that their ‘news’ was wrong.

You sell more copies and attract more eyeballs with fear and spin than facts.

For a feeling of how newspaper publishers have approached Leveson, read Roy Greenslade’s column in The Guardian.

I am for any measure that dilutes the control of of mass media into few hands and I am for any measure that holds media proprietors personally responsible for false and misleading reporting and criminal activity by any who work for them in pursuing story material.

9 likes
Ethics