I have been thinking through the move by Darrell Lea to place their liquorice in Woolworths supermarkets. It does not make sense to me. Darrell Lea has been demanding of their licencees for many years, requiring that their product be displayed in Darrell Lea fixtures to respect the brand and requiring that we take a minimum range of product and not just top sellers.
There are many rules, rules which most newsagents have embraced because they want the point of difference that carrying the Darrell Lea brand brings.
Given that liquorice is the stand our top seller for Darrell Lea, newsagents and other Darrell Lea stockists have lost the point of difference.
While we will still sell Darrell Lea to our shoppers, there will be some who stop buying. These are the regular (pun intended) customers who stop by each week for their bag of Darrell Lea liquorice and nothing else.
This move by Darrell Lea is like the move by newspaper publishers and magazine publishers into supermarkets and other retail channels. They still require us to adhere to rules which they ignore for their new retail buddies. We are restricted in what we can do while the new channels have more control – with magazines especially. The rules for us versus them make us less competitive.
Darrell Lea are doing what they think is right for their business. Good luck to them. As a Darrell Lea stockist I am left wondering about all of their preaching for many years about the respect they want from retailers for their brand. Going into a mass network like Woolworths throws all that preaching out the window.
I saw their liquorice in two Woolworths supermarkets yesterday. It was lost in a sea of candy and treated the same as the cheap liquorice next to it. Back at my newsagency, Darrell Lea continues to be treated as a hero product, situated on the Darrell Lea required wood stand and located in just about the best position in-store.
It feels like Darrell Lea does not respect its long standing retail partners.