A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

Competition

News Corp. papers continue pressure on Tatts and small business newsagents with Lottoland report

The Weekend Australian today runs what to me reads like another Lottoland press release, continuing the News Corp. support for Lottoland.

Dirt campaign, really? What Tatts did is provide newsagents with resources to use if they wished, resources that reflected what Lottoland offers in terms of products. Tatts did this at the urging of lottery retailers. Click here to see part of the Tatts campaign. This is hardly dirt.

In the article, there is also mention of the Lottoland focus on ALNA, the body representing newsagents nationally in the fight against the Lottoland betting business.

Mr Brill earlier this month said he believed the government had been misled into believing that ALNA represented the views of 4000 newsagents nationally, when its membership was 707 paid members.

ASIC documents, he said, raised questions about ALNA’s ability to operate as a going concern, let alone to represent the interests of its members.

“Rather than address the shocking state of its financial affairs, ALNA has inexplicably taken part in a $5m lobbying campaign to convince the government to ban online lottery betting, which will leave newsagents at the mercy of a Tabcorp monopoly,” the Lottoland chief said.

All the money in the lobbying campaign was spent prior to the $11 billion merger between Tatts and Tabcorp, which was completed late last year.

In a letter to NSW Racing Minister Paul Toole, also obtained by The Australian, Mr Brill says Tatts had funded a $5m national campaign to eradicate Lottoland as a competitor and to preserve its market power.

Lottoland is the company that launched chef in Australia attacking newsagents, all newsagents, mocking us, belittling us, all to sell what was pitched as a lottery product when, in fact, it was a betting product.

While I can no longer find the first ad they aired as it is no longer on YouTube, this one is still available:

They ran their ads mocking newsagents relentlessly. We were their first and prime target for more than a year. Back then there was no talk of wanting fairness for Australians or offering of support for newsagents. No, they only did that when federal parliament got closer to banning their model.

I complained to the advertising standards council and ACMA about their ads, without success. It think there was a standards issue with their actions. There was success by others against Lottoland on standards.

The report in today’s paper reads like it was written by the Lottoland PR people as it lacks genuine reporting and it lacks balance in my opinion.

The NSW Public Lotteries Act says a licensee has to be of “good repute, having regard to … honesty and integrity”.

Disciplinary action can include sanctions and suspension of licences. Tatts subsidiary NSW Lotteries Corp holds three licences in NSW.

Lottoland, which takes bets on overseas lotteries, offered news and lottery agents across Australia a profit-sharing arrangement, under which newsagents would receive 20 per cent of profits generated from every bet on overseas lotteries that they referred to Lottoland.

Where is the question of integrity and honesty in terms of Lottoland and what they have done to the newsagent channel. For most of their time in Australia they waged a successful campaign turning traffic away from newsagency businesses. Where is News Corp. on this? Why is this not a story?

Non Australian tax paying Overseas betting agency wages war on small business family newsagents.

Where is that headline in the News Corp. newspapers?

The Lottoland PR machine is good. It has the right connections and it has apparent easy access within News Corp., which itself could benefit from investigation. It is being aided and abetted by state based VANA and NANA support. As I noted yesterday, this maintains a decades-long split in our channel.

While federal politicians go through the legislative process, lottery retailers need to be focussed on their over the counter pitch.

My view that newsagents have nothing to gain from a relationship with Lottoland has not changed.

But back to business. On October 11, 2016 I suggested on this blog ways lottery retailers could, through their actions, push back on Lottoland. here they are again as I think actions over the counter are what are needed still:

  1. Ensure your lottery customers receive excellent customer service every time. Excellent customer service is:
  2. Always smile.
  3. Never sit behind the counter.
  4. Never charge a credit or debit card surcharge.
  5. Always have the youngest person working at the lottery counter.
  6. Provide free breath mints at the counter for staff.
  7. Provide hand sanitiser for staff and customers to access at the counter.
  8. If anyone behind the counter wears reading glasses, take them off when talking with customers – do not leave them on and look over them.
  9. Blokes should not wear cardigans or jumpers such as what we see in the Lottoland ad.
  10. Be cheerful when paying out a prize on tickets purchased elsewhere.
  11. Be cheerful when people say the same thing over and over. The alternative is having no one in your shop at all.
  12. If you sell candy of any sort, every so often offer a free tasting. Look for more ways to add value to the shopper visit.
  13. In winter offer free soup at lunchtime.
  14. In summer offer access to cups and filtered water.
  15. If you are on the high street, have a bowl of water for dogs.
  16. Celebrate all wins in-store on your noticeboard as well as on your business Facebook page.
  17. Run a second chance draw and actively encourage every customer to engage with this. Be generous with the prize.
  18. As an alternative for a second chance draw, host a BBQ event in the shop for the prize draw. Di this once a year, quarterly or six monthly with the prize commensurate with the frequency and business size. For example, in a shop with $250,000 in lottery commission, second chance draw prizes should value at least $10,000 a year. In fact, if it were my business, I’d be more likely to go with $24,000, $2,000 a month. Yes, you have to be that bold I think.
  19. Establish a community noticeboard and welcome free notices. Somewhere on the board have a subtle sign: Your support of this business helps us support your community.
  20. Share links to news reports about data security breaches by hackers with comments like: shopping in-store is safer or Our shop is a hacker free zone. Print the stories and place them on your community noticeboard.
  21. List every local community group you support on the noticeboard with a certificate.
  22. Thank community groups you support with a note on Facebook like: We are grateful for the opportunity to support the work of xxx community group.
  23. Ensure your staff understand what Lottoland is and isn’t and are able to explain why purchasing lottery products from your business is better for them and the community.
  24. From out the front of your shop make sure it looks appealing to passers-by.
  25. As people step into the shop make sure the pitch is fresh and enjoyable. Get rid of anything that looks or feels like an old-style newsagency.

All newsagents selling lottery products need to urgently ensure their businesses look nothing like the Lottoland depiction. You have to distance yourselves from the Lottoland depiction.

This work is urgent. No one will do it for you. Tatts appears asleep at the wheel on Lottoland. Or, as I suspect, they like the idea of educating people to move online.

30 likes
Competition

NANA weighs in on Tatts move on newsagent commission

NANA sent out this email earlier today. I’ll let it speak for itself:

Lotteries announcement – no surprises – let’s watch the leopard change its spots
The announcement earlier this afternoon from Tabcorp/Tatts Group Lotteries comes as no surprise. The competitive pressure caused by alternate online wagering products, in NANA’s opinion, is having an impact on the shoddy treatment that Tabcorp/Tatts Group has dished out to lotteries franchisees for too long.

Remember, Tabcorp/Tatts Group is currently and has been for some time, directly competing against lotteries franchisees in the online space. Their 31 December 2017 financial reports emphasise they had already achieved 16 1/2% of total sales online. There is every likelihood that figure is now higher as their attempts to redirect sales to online continue.

NANA is not sure how “the Lott” can do anything regarding a remuneration model. “the Lott” doesn’t have any commercial relationships with Newsagents in NSW and ACT. “the Lott” is a branding exercise. In NSW and ACT your lotteries franchise is with NSW Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd.

Just about every day the outlet survey program interrupts your business and raises often insignificant and almost pointless matters which require correction. NANA received a referral from a Member Newsagent today. His shop was visited by a NSW Lotteries area manager on the day before a site survey inspection. The area manager said all was good. The survey resulted in a breach notice. If the full time staff of NSW Lotteries cannot get things right, why should Newsagents then be disadvantaged? The survey staff are not Newsagents or lotteries agents. Many appear to be part-time students or backpackers. NANA recently had cause to request that one surveyor be taken off the account – they turned up in joggers, tracksuit pants, a t-shirt and baseball cap. The only thing missing was the “hoody”. The same surveyor refused to correctly identify themselves. Surveyors are taking photographs of your shop which are in direct contravention of the method specified on Retailers Web. Their habit of taking a panoramic photograph from each of the corners of your shop gives them a total floor plan. This is a security issue. It is also in direct contravention of the stated standard from NSW Lotteries. They know it, NSW Lotteries know it, but nothing changes.

The strong identification by Tatts Group of one newsagency group is clear evidence that the “quid pro pro” for blindly supporting Tatts Group’s $5M campaign to deny Newsagents of another income stream is being delivered. Unless you as a lotteries outlet are prepared to turn your terminal off or starve Tatts Group of income from sales, collective bargaining under the guise of an ACCC endorsement is a ruse.

Neither Tatts Group Lotteries, Tabcorp nor NSW Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd creates public infrastructure like hospitals, schools and sporting groups. They bought a license from the NSW Government. They pay a license fee. If the NSW Government held onto the business themselves (like in Western Australia) they would still have the income. License fees are paid and the NSW Government accepts fees into consolidated revenue and then it decides how to spend the money, the same way as it decides how to spend any other money it receives. They could be using the money for anything, there is no way to tell.

Tatts Group and the other entities may donate money to good causes. That is different to what they claim. If they do donate, that’s good news.

How much aggro have the recent changes to Powerball caused you? They were warned but appear to have done nothing in advance to address obvious concerns raised by Newsagents..

How does a leopard suddenly change its spots.

NSW Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd could have extended the moratorium on selling lotteries products in chain supermarkets. They have been asked to extend it by the NSW Government as a show of support for Newsagents and other lotteries outlets. There has not been an extension.

NANA looks forward to working with Tabcorp/Tatts Lotteries and NSW Lotteries Corporation as we enter a new age of positive engagement. NANA also looks forward to working closely with VANA, our sister organisation in Victoria as we work together to ensure that the largest combined block of Newsagents in Australia get a fair go from the lotteries franchisors.

0 likes
Competition

Phil Taylor closing at the end of this month?

I have been told by two sources this afternoon that card and wrap supplier Phil Taylor is closing at the end of this month. Word has got out as staff have been advised. This is sad news for them, tough, too.

There were indications of challenges when Henderson Greetings picked up the local representation of products from Paper Rose, successful publisher of ranges such as Designers Guild, Avocado, The Art Group, Mozaic, Artisan, Daisy Patch plus more.

While this is sad news, if true, for those working for Phil Taylor, it is equally challenging for other card companies as well as card retailers. We must all recalibrate our businesses when changes occur, even changes in supplier businesses not core to our operation.

Card and wrap remains a strong category for our channel with newsagency businesses accounting for close to 30% of all retail sales.  I think we can grow this percentage by being more engaged ourselves in our own businesses rather than expecting our suppliers to do everything for us.

The current trend is flat to modest, 2% – 4% – year-on-year revenue same-store growth in this category in newsagencies. While some are enjoying double-digit growth, they are balanced baby others experiencing double-digit decline, and this brings the channel average down.

Keys to growth, in my view are shop floor engagement inside and outside the card department, out of store engagement and focus on adding value to the card shopper experience.

Too often, newsagents do not engage with the category in a meaningful way. Too often they expect their card supplier(s) to do all the work. While this was okay in the past, it is not okay today.

The newsagents I see enjoying double-digit growth are deeply engaged with the category, running a card offer equal to or better than the truly specialist card retailers. Any newsagent can do this. however, it takes change in everyday operation and engagement with cards to be a destination focus of the business.

Less choice in suppliers benefits big business. This is what we must push back against. we need more Australians thinking of newsagencies first as the place to buy cards. Once way we can do this is to grow the card buying population … however, that is a topic for another time.

In the meantime, we’re thinking of the Phil Taylor family.

9 likes
Competition

The competitive neutrality inquiry into the ABC and SBS is a small business fail for the government

For years, newsagents have called for an inquiry into the competitive neutrality of the government owned Australian Post retail businesses. I wrote about it here in 2005.

One argument is that Australia Post leverages its essential service status to gain access to advantageous tenancy arrangements that are not accessible to newsagents and other small businesses that compete with them. Another argument is that Australia Post leverages its protected monopoly status in leveraging supplier deals.

Australia Post, through its corporate stores directly competes with small business newsagents.

Successive governments have demonstrated no interest into an inquiry.

Fast forward to 2018. The ABC runs a report critical of government economic policy and is hassled by News Corp and wham! we have a competitive neutrality inquiry into the ABC.

The politicians and big business put themselves ahead of the needs of small business retailers like newsagents.

The Australia Post and ABC matters are related in that they are about competitive neutrality.

I say that Australia Post does more economic damage to small business newsagents and other retailers than the ABC digital strategy does to News Corp. and other media companies.

The politicians show their hand by moving quickly on the ABC inquiry and ignoring calls on the Australia Post matter. Big business is their friend. We are not – despite the nonsense they peddle at election time.

My view is underscored by the $30 million given to Foxtel recently without any business case being made and without any requirement on transparency re its use. Oh, and the elimination of TV broadcast licences because of the cost of digital transformation for TV networks. If only we had a government that cared about small business to the same extent.

We in small business need politicians who are as focussed and energised for us and those we serve as those in Canberra who do the bidding of big business. No, actually, we need politicians who serve the whole country rather than so many we have today who serve their mates ahead of the vast majority of Australians. Shame on us, we get those we vote for.

30 likes
Competition

Tatts pitching the $12M Powerball for online purchase

This came up on my phone just now. Clicking on it takes me to an App purchase. There is no pitch about in-store.

In the App, here are three update screens, each with information of interest to retailers:

The migration of over the counter lottery purchases to mobile and online is the largest single threat to lottery shopper traffic to lottery retail businesses. Nothing can stop this migration. What retailers can do is work on attracting shoppers for other product categories, while, at the same time, pushing back on capital expenditure demanded by their lottery supplier for in-store changes of doubtful commercial value.

The migration of lottery purchases to online and mobile does not need to mean the end of a business.

In shining as  light on this I am not criticising g Tatts as this is what I waked do if I were them. It is the best move for their shareholders.

11 likes
Competition

Lottoland launches a petition

Lottoland is begging Australians to sign a petition to keep them in business in Australia. Here is their pitch:

WHY WE NEED YOUR HELP

The Federal Government announced in late March that it wanted to ban all forms of online betting on lotteries – the products Lottoland Australia currently offers to our more than 650,000 customers.

The Government says the ban will help newsagents but the truth is that there is no evidence our products have had any impact on news and lottery agents.

Why not?Because we do NOT sell any products that are also sold by news or lottery agents.

We do NOT compete with them.

In other words, the legislation is unnecessary.

YOUR CHOICE, YOUR MONEY

If the legislation is passed by Parliament, hundreds of thousands of Australians like you will be stopped from betting on lottery outcomes online.

We know you enjoy the occasional flutter, especially on multi-million dollar overseas lotteries such as El Gordo in Spain or EuroMillions.

That is why in just a little over two years, more than 650,000 Australians have joined Lottoland Australia.

It’s your money and it should be YOUR choice.

WHAT YOU CAN DO

If we want to convince the Government to reconsider its proposed ban, we need to act. We need your help.

What can you do? Plenty.

  • You can sign this petition.
  • You can write, email or phone your local Federal Member of Parliament.
  • You can write to your local newspaper or call your local radio station opposing the proposed ban on online lottery betting.

Make your voice heard!

VOTE FOR CHOICE!

Give them their due, they are fighters. In fact, they came out fighting in Australia at launch, attacking and mocking small business newsagents, relentlessly.

I am not signing their petition.

4 likes
Competition

Here is why I think newsagents have nothing to gain from a relationship with Lottoland

In my opinion, there is no value for small business newsagents in supporting or working with Lottoland. here is why:

  1. Lottoland launched in Australia mocking newsagents. Their attack on newsagency businesses and those who run them was relentless and hurtful. It cost newsagents respect and revenue.
  2. Lottoland now wants to partner with newsagents because federal parliament appears set to ban betting on lotteries. Boo hoo to them.
  3. Lottoland is an online-first business. Everywhere it operates it is about online sales. Any partnership with high street retail would be contrary to their core operation. I suspect if they did partner with retailers, online would always be their core focus.
  4. Lottoland is coming at this the wrong way around. If a high street pitch was important to them they should have put it in place when they launched into Australia.
  5. Lottoland says it wants to pay taxes and be a contributor to the Australian economy. If this was the case they would have established this from the outset and not pitched it now, moments away from their core offer being outlawed.
  6. Lottoland has been dishonest in its representations. Last year, they claimed to be talking to newsagents. No genuine approach had been made. From where I sit it looked like smoke and mirrors.
  7. Lottery products are highly regulated around the world. There are many reasons for this, most are good reasons. While I do not like the monopoly approach in Australia, the regulation is important and necessary.

The issue here is not about newsagents and their businesses. Nor is it about regulation or protection. Newsagency businesses need to live or die as a result of the actions of the owners in running a compelling and appreciated local businesses for the communities in which they serve. This and local community desire will determine if newsagency businesses survive.

The issue here is about Lottoland, their operation and their ethics.

They launched into Australia running a campaign over which they had 100% control. That told us about the company and what it stands for.

Their TV commercials were, in my opinion, dishonest and disrespectful. They are reaping what they sowed.

Footnote: the newsagency today cannot be the newsagency Australians remember from the past. Today’s newsagency is a shop leaning into change, offering different products thoughtfully selected and carefully curated for local community needs. Whereas in the past people walked in the door of a newsagency for papers, magazines and lotteries first. Today, many newsagencies have people walking in for more high-end sought after lines with papers, magazines and lotteries becoming the impulse add-on.

17 likes
Competition

Suppliers promoting retailers on social media need to lift their game

The publisher of Breathe magazine promoted newsagents on social media, and Woolworths.

The post from yesterday says participating newsagents. You have to go to their website to find them.

However, on their website it is all about them selling direct to the shopper.

It is only when you scroll down to the bottom of the home page that you see the store finder link. Once you click that you enter a suburb and it them displays a map of stockists.

Once you get to the map it is terrific. They need to make this easier to find. It could be in front of people landing on their home page, without needing to scroll or even click on a link. That is what they should do if theirs is a over the counter purchase first strategy.

If the publisher strategy is that retail serves to facilitate the publisher / reader relationship then they should continue doing what they are doing.

I like to see suppliers promote stockists and do appreciate that newsagents get a mention from the folks at Breathe. However, I (selfishly, of course) want them to do it with a retailer first approach. In fact, a newsagents first approach. That approach would drive our engagement is it demonstrates respect for the us.

Re this pitch for Breathe: Woolworths is at an advantage and that is unfortunate.

21 likes
Competition

Lottoland CEO reflects on retreating from selling best in Australian lotteries

9 News ran a story two days ago on Lottoland in which Luke Brill, Lottoland CEO, made some comments newsagents may find interesting:

“What Tatts wants to do is to protect the online space. They don’t care about the newsagents really, so when this obviously natural transition happens, it’s got nothing to do with Lottoland – it’s to do with the internet,” said Brill.

“People’s behaviour is changing. You don’t go to the video store anymore; you go to Netflix.

“Unfortunately, the reality is that for the next generation of people coming through, it’s unlikely they will go to newsagents to buy a lottery ticket.”

5 likes
Competition

Checking out Lottoland syndicates

With Lottoland no longer selling bets on the numbers drawn for  Australian lottery games, I expect it will intensify its marketing of bets on overseas lotteries.  One focus I think we will see is more of is their syndicates. They have a comprehensive offer.

Check out the syndicates page on their website. It offers plenty of syndicates. Their packaging and marketing is clever. It is competitive against the way syndicates are handled for Australian lotteries.

Understanding a competitor is a important step in successfully competing. This is why I suggest newsagents who sell lottery products thoroughly research the Lottoland pitch, including their syndicators pitch.

I don’t see Lottoland retreating from Australia in the short to medium term. It wouldn’t surprise me if we heard more from them, not less … along with all the others players now in this online lottery relates space.

9 likes
Competition

Lottoland announces end of betting on Australian lotteries

Luke Brill, CEO of Lottoland, send this message to customers this afternoon:

Hi Mark,

We’ve not seen you around in a while and it would be great to have you back on board. I’d like to keep you up to date with all things Lottoland.

It’s been a huge year for us, in which we crowned our first Millionaire, paid out over $15m in winnings and launched our partnership with the Manly Sea Eagles and the Northern Territory’s, Mitchell Street Mile.

These are milestones we’re immensely proud of and are a sign of things to come.

On a different note, sadly, I have to announce that due to regulatory changes, after November 30, we can no longer accept bets on the Australian Lotteries. Namely, Mon&Wed Lotto, Tuesday Lotto, Thursday Lotto and Saturday Lotto.

Single and Subscription bets on these lotteries that were placed before November 30 will be honoured and winnings will be paid as though you entered the official underlying draw. Subscriptions will not be renewed after this date.

We will continue to keep you informed about new products and exciting alternatives available. To give you the chance to explore, here’s an early Christmas present:

Whatever you spend on your next cart, the first $5 is on us!

Kind Regards,

Luke Brill (CEO Lottoland Australia)

The withdrawal from betting on Australian lotteries has been brought after a long battle including late but welcome, I am sure, engagement by politicians from all sides on the Lottoland threat to lottery retailers, Tatts and, most important, government revenue.

I think this note from Brill could reflect a change in messaging from Lottoland.

Brill specifically refers to a Lottoland purchase as a bet. This has not been key in their advertising to now.

Yes, it is a bet, something that even Tatts did not push back against until late in the day.

9 likes
Competition

WA newsagents pushing back against Lotterywest online campaign

Newsagents in Western Australia are removing promotional material in-store for Lotterywest online gaming sign up as a dispute with the state government owned lottery operator escalates.

While the newsagent / Lotterywest relationship improved with the change of government earlier this year, recent pressure from Lotterywest for newsagents to promote a service from which they make no money has seen a setback in progress.

How this matter is handled is vitally important given the awful few years in the newsagent / Lotterywest relationship leading up to the change of government.

Watch this space as WA newsagents work together to agitate for fairness.

There is no doubt that Lotterywest needs to serve customers online. They are behind Tatts on this front. However, they need to do it with newsagents, to show a small business partnership can work, to show the Tatts ignorance of and refusal to genuinely respect newsagents is the wrong move.

Newsagents have been the retail face of lotteries in Australia since launch.

Most newsagents see lottery each customer as their customer.

Many newsagents have won and nurtured these customers.

Newsagents have done the hard yards.

Tatts misses these points.

Hopefully, Lotterywest respects newsagents for what they have done and can do for the community owned business.

7 likes
Competition

Communication from ALNA from an approach by Lottoland

Luke Brill, CEO of Lottoland, visited the ALNA head office to talk newsagents, almost a year after his company started attacking and mocking our channel, calling on shoppers to stop shopping in newsagents.

here is a report from ALNA about the visit:

Lottoland’s Desperate Plea 
Lottoland CEO Luke Brill visited the ALNA head office to ask us to join them and refrain from the fierce lobbying campaign that we have been undertaking in the last 18 months.

On the top of his agenda was the plan to engage newsagents to sell his product. ALNA CEO Adam Joy made it very clear that Lottoland had damaged the relationship with news and lottery agents by:

  1.  Producing advertisements that intended to harm newsagents and humiliate them publicly by labelling them unable to move with the times.
  2.  Leveraging of the news and lottery agents hard work in the misleading way he communicated to members of the public
  3. Holding interviews outside newsagencies
  4. Using imagery and wording so close to the official lotteries that led to confusion for customers
  5. Ignoring the original and official channel for news and lotteries initially by taking a belligerent approach to proceed without any consideration for the community benefits from news and lottery agents
  6. Deliberate marketing to undermine current jackpots.
  7.  Promoting large discounts and special offers to gamble with Lottoland instead of playing the official draw
  8. Misleading social media advising customers they could play all their games in one APP.
  9. Dishonesty in interviews where Lottoland claimed to not be targeting newsagent customers and claiming they are seeking new customers, Adam challenged this and asked why they use imagery, wording and colours of an Official Lottery? The answer provided by Brill did not answer the question.

Mr Brill said he would happily run a new TV advert where the person went back into the newsagent and was elated they could now access Lottoland. Adam advised that this was patronising and further enhanced the feeling that we were behind the times and late to the party.

Adam challenged Mr Brill on his comments from last meeting, where he claimed they will fly as close to IP replication without infringing, Mr Brill confirmed this was still their intention.

ALNA feel a public Apology in TV, Radio and print apologising to the network and transparently declaring that they have used existing IP and Newsagents to leverage their business and in our opinion that this was misleading.

It is apparent the recent announcements we have achieved by working in unison with the WA VIC, NSW and Tasmanian Governments have them rattled. He tried to talk about Tatts Lotteries with Adam about what Tatts are doing to retailers, Adam advised him that we have a separate discussion with Tatts and that this is irrelevant to the Lottoland plan to leverage newsagent customers.

ALNA continue to work with the other states and federally for a total announcement. We heard in Tasmania on the weekend even if the opposition win the next election they will also ban the wagering on the outcome of lotteries.

Further evidence of Lottoland’s plan for official lottery customers, Lottoland again extended an offer to pay newsagents a monthly marketing fee and a trailing commission on all transactions. Adam challenged why he would do this if he did not want newsagent customers and were focused on new customers? The response was so ALNA would leave Lottoland alone.

Mr Brill then went further and said, “what if we stopped focusing and transacting on domestic lotteries and only focused on overseas jackpots?” Adam advised this was an unanswerable question as there are many variables to this

  1. This does not stop other lotto wagering companies in the domestic market. E.g. nedd lotto, magpie millions and others.
  2. Lottoland could trade under another name and do this e.g. the white labelled William Hill product Planet Lottery.
  3. There is no guarantee of the length of time Lottoland would commit to this
  4. How could we trust Lottoland going forward?

Adam asked if they could change their name to Bet on Lotto and be transparent to what it is? The answer was that they have built a good brand around Lottoland. Adam interrupted and said on the back of news and lottery agents and the official imagery and words?

Mr Brill ended the conversation advising he will put an offer in writing to Adam, Adam advised he would share it with the Board and members but did not hold high hopes for its adoption.

6 likes
Competition

Interesting interview with Lottoland CEO

David Spears interviewed the CEO of LottoLand on Sky News. Click here for a report of the interview and a story about a looming ban for Lottoland in Tasmania.

Be sure to watch the video in the story. At 7:57, Luke Brill, Lottoland CEO says when talking about Tatts: they’re using the little newsagents as pawns in the game. Lottoland launched targeting newsagents, using newsagents as pawns in the game.

At 8:06, Brill says 15% of Tatts revenue comes from the online space.

Brill is right about this. I also think he is right when he says Tatts has no interest in protecting newsagents.

Sure, Lottoland is a menace and a competitor of newsagents. However, tatts is a much bigger competitor and it is growing faster than Lottoland.

10 likes
Competition

Discounting Halloween too soon

There is a party shop in Melbourne that is already discounting Halloween products by 50%. This, on top of deals in Coles, the Reject Shop and retailers elsewhere make everyday, low-value, Halloween unprofitable for plenty of retailers.

Our focus is on party, costumes and more specialty themes. These are places where early season discounts are less likely.

No business wins from early season discounting.

4 likes
Competition

Clever Lottoland TVC

This TVC from Lottoland was in high rotation on free to air TV last night. It is a clever ad, looking like regular, timely, programming. Looking like legitimate lottery products on sale. While I get that state governments are crawling to resolve the Lottoland operation challenge, Lottoland appears to be spending like there is no tomorrow.

0 likes
Competition