Author: Mark Fletcher

The Chicago Sun-Times is the first major US newspaper to stop publishing daily share price listings as announced in this story. Their comprehensive listing has been replaced with a two page summary.

While the Sun-Times story was upbeat and full of spin, the Chicago Tribune reported the story as an imporant news item – heralding a new era:

The Sun-Times appears to be the nation’s first large-circulation daily paper to do away with the tables, though many publications have been trimming them for more than a decade.

Sun-Times business editor Dan Miller did not return a call seeking comment on the move, announced in the newspaper’s Tuesday’s editions.

“It’s a recognition that for a great majority of readers it’s redundant,” said Sun-Times Publisher John Cruickshank. “It’s not an easy way to present the stock. It’s a whole lot easier to go on the Web.”

And further on is this telling par:

Since the dawn of the Internet, newspapers have wrestled with the question of which content should appear in the printed publication and which should be duplicated or appear exclusively online.

This might be a tipping point for newspapers. Publishers are a proud bunch and would not want to be first out of the gate with a change like this. Now that the gate is open it will be interesting to see who follows. The decision demonstrates the power of mobile and online access to time sensitive information. Also, it frees the newspaper to do what the medium does best. It will be crucial that they embrace that opportunity to ensure relevance.

The US Sports Illustrated magazine has gone live with professionally produced video content to support stories in the magazines. At SI.com you can access stories behind the stories in the magazine.

Online Media Daily quotes Jeff Price, vice president and chief of marketing at SI.com. “The idea is to play both mediums to their strengths,” said Price. “We’re looking forward to great online/print opportunities for the editions coming up that will be devoted to college and pro football.”

The Sports Illustrated strategy has three elements from what I can see: to support a high subscription price; to engage readers (viewers) with their brand for longer; and to position the brand for disaggregating stories from the magazine.

While SI video content is currently available to everyone, I’d expect it soon to be available only to subscribers. I’d also expect audio and video content to be available on a story by story basis. This is how the younger demographic prefers to purchase content and smart publishers chasing the younger demographic will give them what they want.

The video stories at SI.com are professionally produced and carry advertising.

It’s a fine line they are playing since newsstand and subscription sales are important. New Media sales will be equally important. Hence the need to focus on their brand in multiple mediums at once and engage in precision balancing – ensuring that growth in one medium does not pull does sales in another medium which that medium is key to revenue.

Sports Illustrated is not a big title in Australia and we could be forgiven for brushing their new initiatives off. That would be ignorant. The lead by SI and some others needs to be understood, especially by the traditional news and information supply chain. There are new supply chain alternatives which we need to be playing in and or responding to.

Sports Illustrated are demonstrating that the world has changed.

Given the research indicating that the 18-34 demographic are moving away from traditional forms of news and information retail businesses like mine which rely on news and information product (newspapers and magazines) for 50% of our customer traffic need to change to be more attractive to the younger audience while not alienating the older audience. Here’s what we are doing:

Promoting recharge. The 18 – 34 demographic is the recharge age range. We’re creating a loyalty promotion around multiple recharges. Whether they recharge phones, online access or debit cards. We’re happy to reward their traffic to our shop.

Make the shop friendly for 18 – 34. Newsagencies are considered to be places for older people. During our push for youth we’re making the front third of our shop youth friendly. We figure if we show product like music, skater, surf, fashion and teen magazines it will help create the connect.

Sound. We’re being careful about the music we play.

Product placement. We’re being careful to place 18 – 34 product away from content of interest to older customers where possible.

Funkier product. We’re breaking away from the traditional newsagency product mix. For example, in our greeting card department we’re carrying non traditional cards and as a result are seeing double digit growth.

Asking what they want. We’re talking to our customers to find out what they want.

Shopping basket analysis. We’re trying to understand what sells with what and how this can be considered in the context of demographic.

Free internet access. We’re trialing making Net access free in 15 minute chunks. Our hope is that this will show us as more Net friendly and therefore make us more interesting to the age range we’re pursuing.

Traditionally, our centre changes. Early in the week most visitors are in the 50+ age range. Friday through Sunday it is younger people including young families.

Like most of Australia’s 4,600 newsagencies we have catered for tradition. Sticking with what newsagencies have been for over 100 years. While our tradition is to be celebrated, it will not provide a viable future for us. We know the world has changed and it’s time for us to change with it. The list above is a small step on the road to change many newsagents will have to take.

Matthew Flamm reports at Crain’s New York Business that on June 9 the New York Times will will begin sending out street hawkers every Thursday afternoon to hand out copies of MarketPlace, a full-color, tabloid-sized classified advertising guide. MarketPlace will also include articles reprinted from the New York Times. Initial distribution is expected to be 150,000.

Newspapers are pursuing a range of avenues to attract younger readers and others who are ignoring the traditional newsstand purchase. Most strategies cut out the existing supply chain.

Technology has broken the corporate news monopoly. Digital cameras, camera phones, blogs, and RSS put the tools of the news trade into the hands of the public, and now real news comes from real people everywhere. Now you can demand coverage of the stories you care about—all you need is nowPublic.

And with that, NowPublic introduces itself to the world. NowPublic is a grassroots world news coverage service where anyone can have a voice. You can also nominate news items for extra coverage.

Peter Shankman predicts the “death” of a major US newspaper in 2007 and that a “digital-only” version will replace it in his blog – PR. Differently. Shankman runs a PR firm, The Geek Factory. Whether he is right or not is immaterial. That the prediction is our there and being quoted by others puts the prospect up for discussion and that, of itself, can give momentum to what started as a predition.

Fascinating points coming from the Digital Media Round Table at the WAN 58th World Newspaper Congress in Korea yesterday. Here are some comments posted by Robb Montgomery, CEO – Visual Editors:

While my landlord dictates what minimum hours my shop must open, the Australia Post retail outlet directly opposite my newsagency operates off different rules. They close at lunchtime on Saturdays and all day Sunday – avoiding employee penalty rates. While one could argue the extra hours provide my business with an advantage, without the mail services to draw people to our part of the centre, we don’t get enough tarffic on Sundays to cover wages. There are two sets of rules in play and it’s the independent businesses which are worse off than the government owned Post Office.

The government should divest itself of the Australia Post retail channel.

Newspaper publishers and editors are meeting in Seoul this week at the World Association of Newspapers conference. In his opening remarks, Gavin O’Reilly, Acting President of WAN challenged the place of newspapers in the increasingly mobile and digital world. “After 400 years of newspapers rightly dominating the media landscape – and successfully weathering the onslaught of radio, TV and latterly the new digital age – it’s hard to see the full-time whistle blowing quite yet.” And then this: “Believe me – this game is not over: we’re not even into extra time. News-papers represent an integral part of over a billion people’s life every day – showcasing and celebrating the serendipity of life.” The full speech can be found here.

Changing Channels is an excellent article by Rana Foroohar and published this week by Newsweek. While broad in its coverage of the challenges facing television, a core focus of this article is the impact of dramatic distribution changes on the medium. What is the future of television if the IPTV distribution channel becomes viable? The same question is on the table for all mainstream media distribution channels including Australian newsagents who rely on newspapers and magazines to generate more than 50% of their foot traffic. News and information supply chains face huge challenges.

Scott Anderson is the Director of shared content for Chicago-based Tribune Publishing and Interactive. A journalist, Anderson has worked in various reporting and editing capacities at Tribune since 1981. He created his blog to keep Tribune staff abreast of online media developments. It’s just been made public.

This blog is an excellent resource for those interested in online media developments from the perspective of someone deeply connected with mainstream media. That the blog has been made public is a tribute to the Tribune and to Anderson.

Can’t find any newspaper executives blogging in Australia.

The US TV Guide has launched a podcast, TV Guide Talk, which they say provides: “inside scoop, off-beat opinions and answers to your questions about the latest entertainment headlines, the hottest TV shows, the newest movies and the biggest celebrities in this weekly Podcast”.

The TV Guide folks are engaging with their audience by inviting feedback on stories listeners want to hear in future podcasts.

Okay, so here we have a magazine creating audio content and making it available at no cost. Currently, the content is like a segment of the magazine, a story if you will. Mediocre production values which I am sure will improve if they see consumer acceptance of their experiment. Advertiser support will follow.

If they improve content and production and if technology continues to evolve to make podcast access easier (and it will), the TV Guide experiment will become their preferred method of getting their brand to consumers. Podcasts, like magazines, are, for the publisher, the delivery mechanism for advertising. They cut out the traditional news and information supply chain.

Given easy access to TV Guide like program schedules online and more up to date than the printed product and the launch now of these podcasts it is reasonable to wonder about the implications for the magazine and those who sell the magazine. There will be a tipping point. It’s a way off but how far off is anyone’s guess. That they are playing in this space is proof that they can see a tipping point. Maybe the magazine will morph as a result into something offering more reflective content which lends itself to existing only in print whereas the podcasts will be about more immediate news.

Still no major print media company in Australia playing in the podcast space.

Dan Gillmor is a keynote speaker at the World Association of Newspapers conference in Seoul commencing tomorrow. Yesterday he posted the text of his keynote, What Professional and Citizen Journalists Can Learn From Each Other, at on his blog.

Dan’s is a leading voice in the citizen journalism movement and his keynote speech essential reading for anyone interested in this field. He positions citizen journalism with this statement:

Something important is happening in the world of journalism:. It’s an evolution from the lecture model, to which we in mass media have become accustomed in the past century, to something closer to a conversation. The shift stems from the collision of technology with media.

He then notes:

That, by the way, is the last time I’ll talk about technology today in any specific way, because this trend is more about people than gadgets. Citizen journalism is made possible by what’s new. It will be made excellent because of what people do with it.

I think what he’s saying is that technology is the enabler. The real movement is what people do with it. This is the killer application as software people would call it. The people application. How we embrace the technology and use it to release us from the control of others. Rather than being lectured at as Dan refers to the old model, it’s is a conversation with our input helping shape the result as much as the professional reporter/news gatherer.

I was to be in Seoul, in part to hear Dan speak, and am glad that through his blog and the concurrent World Editors Forum blog I am able to access content electronically.

Those of us on the news and information supply chain can learn from Gillmor for roles we can play in this changing world.

The Wall Street Journal has hosted its third annual D: All Things Digital conference. They say it’s: “…three days of unscripted, frank interviews with the leaders of the digital revolution, responding live onstage to the kinds of tough, smart questions…” The conference has provided excellent discussion including that reported by the Washington Post in their report: News Groups Wrestle With Online Fees.

The article documents the struggle going on within many news and information publishing businesses about how to price online access. Publishers are looking for online to pay its way while at the same time looking more carefully at the print economic model in the face of advertising revenue challenges.

From Leslie Walker’s article:

At the conference the Chairman and Chief Executive of the Washington Post, Donald Graham, claimed that readership of their journalism had more than doubled in the past seven years if they include print, online and their free commuter products. Years ago it was print readership. The Washington Post is but one example of how newspaper publishers are morphing their business model to grow readership. And the changes will continue into more mobile delivery of content.

Again from the Washington Post article:

Hmmm, a cover price increase for newspapers, I’D LIKE TO SEE THAT. The cover price of a newspaper ought to respect the value placed on the content by the publisher. The price should be based on this value judgment and not on fear of consumer reaction.

Kann is right with his analogy. Yesterday I paid A$3.50 for a mediocre coffee at Brisbane airport and threw it away after a sip. A$1.00 for a newspaper is cheap.

I hope Australian publishers are reading the same reports I’m reading.

Newsagents have been good at supporting many businesses in getting a footprint across the Australian retail landscape. Our 4,600 stores see, according to some, 17 million people every two weeks. Even if that number is a bit off newsagents see more than any other retail channel every week than all comers except, probably, Australia Post.

So, because of our national footprint, companies come to newsagencies with promises of good gross profit if we put their new products into our shops.

Such was the case with mobile phone recharge product.

We did the work, provided the retail footprint and enabled a faster national roll out than any other channel could deliver.

Vodafone has just joined other carriers showing their respect for newsagents by cutting the gross profit from each sale. Newsagents have put in the technology, trained employees, put up the point of sale material and attracted customers – as a key part of the Vodafone story.

The thanks we get, now they have critical mass, is less payment for our effort.

Australian newsagents need to stand up to moves by companies like Vodafone and negotiate respect for our unequalled footprint, our extended trading hours and our connection with the community.

Newsagencies are the quintessential independent retailer and we’ll disappear if suppliers like Vodafone continue to squeeze us.

Big Mac, fries and an MP3?, at CNN.com reports that McDonald’s is hoping music downloads, Internet will help attract hipper, tech-savvy crowd.

“This may become the new customer service catchphrase as McDonald’s hopes to reel in the young and tech-savvy with Blaze Net, which allows customers to buy music mobile-phone ring tones, print digital photographs and surf the Internet, according to a report published Wednesday.

The fast-food chain began pilot testing the new ATM-style device May 16 at its new flagship restaurant near the Oakbrook Center shopping mall in Oak Brook, Ill., the Chicago Tribune said. But a spokesman wouldn’t say how many restaurants will add Blaze Net.”

It’s a wise move by McDonalds, one which should be followed by others facing challenges in reaching younger customers.

The McDonalds move will help push mobile technology further and therefore challenge traditional content (news, information, music and video) supply chain channels.

McDonalds are doing what Australia’s 4,600 newsagents should be doing.

Since talking more publicly about our plans for a local (eastern suburbs Melbourne Australia) citizen content news site we have received many emails and calls from people elsewhere around the country telling us to make it national. They get the citizen journalism mantra but not the local focus.

For any citizen journalism project to work there has to be community engagement. This is what will make the decision for us. It may be that we start with a broader focus since this is where there is more interest and provide local links from that broader perspective.

The more people who tell us what they want the better the opportunity for us to get it right.

HP are reporting the development of “an experimental digital storytelling service that lets people use their camera phones and other mobile devices to easily create and instantly share stories with friends and family”.

HP says the process is simple: Using the mobile phone handset as a microphone, users speak into the phone while clicking on thumbnails of photos they want to describe or that illustrate a story. The user experience is similar to recording a traditional voicemail, with the benefit of allowing users to augment the audio track with pictures.

There is a sample story to show the technology off. The sample was made at a conference in the UA a week back.

Puts a whole new slant on citizen journalism. Easier access, different storytelling techniques. Mobile. Citizens are in control. All the elements are there. No supply chain needed.

At Footytalk.com.au you’ll hear The World’s First Australian Rules Football Podcast. Here’s their pitch in their opening blog entry:

Footytalk.com.au provides a unique look at the week in AFL football and some exclusive analysis of AFL Teams, Coaches, Players and the Media. And even a few special guests throughout the year.

Each week your hosts Disco & The Explosion will be bringing you reviews, news, analysis & previews of past & upcoming rounds of AFL football, in an entertaining 30-minute Podcast and Weblog.

These blokes have released 10 podcasts so far and you can hear the difference between #1 and #10.

In a Special report, The Lowdown on Podcasting, Stephen Baker of Business Week tells the mainstream world “Now it’s a lot easier to listen than it is to send your own audio programs into cyberspace. But stay tuned — this party’s just getting started”

Articles like this are essential to the legitimisation of a technology which is barely one year old. That Business Week is devoting such space gives what some called just a few months a ‘fringe’ technology tremendous credence and business context.

Podcasting sets the story free and this is where there are tremendous implications.

I wish I could work out a way for businesses like my retail shop (there are 4,600 of us in Australia who rely on newspaper and magazine sales to deliver at least 50% of our traffic) to quickly have a role in the podcasting world.

A group of media experts have written an excellent report published at The Wall Street Journal Online. How Old Media Can Survive In a New World is a well researched piece about the challenges “traditional media” is facing in the rapidly changing mobile digital world.

There’s no question: Traditional media businesses are struggling.

Newspaper publishers, book publishers, movie studios, music companies, ad agencies, television networks — they’re all trying to figure out how they fit into a new-media world. Their old way of doing business isn’t as profitable as it used to be, but they haven’t found a new way that’s as profitable, either.

Add to that list any other business involved in the news and information supply chain – such as Australia’s 4,600 independently owned newsagencies, the channel created in the 1800s specifically to distribute newspapers and magazines and now in need of finding relevance for itself in the changing world.

Each expert writes on a specific traditional media category: books, newspapers, music, movies and the like. They were asked to consider what they think old-media companies should do to survive.

The newspaper expert, Brian Steinberg, advocates better quality journalism and a customisable news product.

Let readers customize their own newspaper. “The newspaper of the future is going to be a coalition of niche products,” says S.W. “Sammy” Papert III, chairman and CEO of Belden Associates, a Dallas newspaper-industry consultant. That means, for instance, that newspapers should offer online readers — who are used to hunting for narrowly focused information that interests them — an opportunity to create a specialized newspaper according to their areas of interest. So, for example, newspapers might allow their readers to click a few buttons and see all of a paper’s coverage about local politics, excluding everything else. Or readers might opt for a page devoted to sports or cultural news.

Reporting on the challenges is one thing. We’re over that now with even traditional media outlets reporting the impact of technology on the production of news and information. While some continue to wallow in reporting doom and gloom, smart people are turning their attention to what the future might be. This is where small businesses in the news and information supply chain need to focus attention. What’s their future? What do they have to do to ensure their future? The WSJ report does well to focus our attention on moving forward.

Planning for the future begins with understanding the current situation. Hence the need to read reports such as this one at wsj.com.

Australia’s newsagents can build a bright future regardless of what happens to sales of the core products of newspapers, magazines and lottery product – the three categories more likely to be impacted by technology advances. The future could include:

From the American Society of Newspaper Editors: the ASNE reporter asked young people across the nation how they follow the news and how they want their information. The responses, while not announcing the death of newspapers, they do provide a valuable insight into the demographic proving very hard for newspaper publishers to attract.

Environmental concerns seem top of mind with comments like: “It’s a waste of money. Plus it takes trees to make paper…. Some of it gets recycled but most of it ends up in our landfills.” Cost justification is also key as shown with: “I don’t think a lot of people read the newspaper because there are other things to do and we already get information in other ways, TV and the Internet. I don’t see myself buying something I can get for free.”

The Media Centre at the American Press Institute has published an excellent paper: We Media How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. By Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis of Hypergene.

This 66 page paper is an excellent presentation of where We Media (citizen journalism, citizen media, participatory journalism – call it what you will) is at, how mainstream media might react and the implications for all stakeholders. It is a must read paper.

While slanted more toward those in mainstream media than our small We Media project (Local News Daily), it is a welcome additional resource to this conversation. It brings legitimacy to the discussion of the changes being brought about in journalism as a result of huge and rapid technological change and the power the changes deliver to consumers.

Here’s part of the introduction by the respected Dan Gillmor, a leader in the we media movement:

This is all about decentralization. Traditionally centralized news-gathering and distribution is being augmented (and some cases will be replaced) by what’s happening at the edges of increasingly ubiquitous networks. People are combining powerful technological tools and innovative ideas, fundamentally altering the nature of journalism in this new century. There are new possibilities for everyone in the process: journalist, newsmaker and the active “consumer” of news who isn’t satisfied with today’s product — or who wants to make some news, too.

Be sure to read the whole report.

We’re discussing how open to make our citizens media LocalNews Daily site and therefore watching with interest the experience of others. The media drop reported yesterday that the Ventura County Star has disabled comments. Today the Ventura County Star reports why. (You need a password to get in.) Apparently some comments were nasty and off-topic. This is a challenge. While we want to create an open space for unedited comment we also need to ensure that the rights of others are protected and that comment is reasonable. We’re looking at a model based on some form of approval process given the defamation laws in Australia.

In a post headed Local newspaper week: when’s the funeral? Jemima Kiss of journalism.co.uk writes about the importance of citizen journalism for the future of newspapers and especiually local newspapers. Her post is a call for local UK newspapers to get serious about an online startegy or risk having no future at all. Here’s a good quote:

“There is a need for quality local community news online, but most papers in the UK are nowhere near ready for that. If they don’t move into the citizen journalism space soon, someone else will.”

The reality is that many are now playing in the citizen journalism space, most important of these are citizens themselves. Today’s online publishing tools being what they are the barriers have come down.