Unfair magazine KPIs
I am trying to help a newsagent get approved by a magazine distributor for processing magazine returns electronically. The distributor says no because the newsagents has only sent sales data for 50% of the trading days of the month.
Fair enough, the newsagent should be sending sales data every day. However, this is a one-sided relationship. The magazine distributor imposes tough KPIs on newsagents on sales data, invoice payment, displays etc and accepts none in return. They are supplying some titles which sell through at less than 30% yet the newsagent has no mechanism to use against the distributor.
Let’s play this scenario through a bit. The newsagent fixes processes at their end and does send sales data through every day, they are then permitted by the magazine distributor to process returns electronically. What happens about underperforming titles? Nothing.
This is a one-sided, unfair relationship. A magazine distributor treating newsagents as partners would have used the electronic returns request as a carrot rather than a stick.
The magazine distributor ought to stop managing newsagents by blackmail and start treating them as business people.