Further to our Bulletin dated 13 November 2008 re Home Delivery Fees. VANA has been discussing a Home Delivery fee increase with HWT for quite some time and we are extremely disappointed to advise that Peter Blunden, Managing Director of HWT has informed us that we have not been granted an increase. He has stated the following:
“After giving the matter careful consideration, we have decided to seek alternative ways of addressing the issues raised”.
With that, VANA has announced that it has failed, again, to deliver for its members.
No wonder newsagents are quitting newspaper distribution.
In what other business is a service provider expected to carry cost increases every year in labour, fuel and other areas, cope with a reduction in margin and survive with no increase in service to compensate?
Newspaper publishers will wonder, at some point in the future, why newsagents abandoned what was the best newspaper distribution system in Australia. The answer can be found in this decision and many similar decisions which preceded it – to not pay a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work by newsagents.
I know newspaper executives are concerned about the number of newsagents quitting home delivery. They invite such action with decisions such as this. Sadly, the VANA announcement contains no passion on behalf of newsagents.
I wonder who VANA used to prepare and represent its case? If this was done in-house or by VANA Board members then it has let its members down. On a case such as this, professional representation is essential so that the newsagent position and negotiation is as strong as the other side. Such a case would have included information on advertising rates as a comparison among other things.
Home delivery is a service by newsagents. It is only reasonable that they set the fee they cahrge for the service they provide.