There are several battles being waged at present around which businesses can get direct supply of magazines. I know of newsagencies selling more than $8,000 in magazines a week which are being denied direct supply access while a small supermarket nearby selling considerably less is given a direct account without challenge.
There are some who would say that the distribution newsagent must be protected. These same people do not fight when a new supermarket or convenience outlet opens and gets a direct account – because newsagents lost that fight years ago. They only fight when a newsagent (subagent to them) wants to go direct. They do this because the magazine distributors will probably agree with them – the individual newsagent wanting a direect account is not as powerful as, say, IGA, Coles or Woolworths.
In situations of which I am aware right now, goot retail newsagents are being blocked from accessing direct supply of magazines. This will encourage them to reduce focus on magazines. Publishers will be the losers. I wonder if they know how magazine distributors are managing the representation of their product in the changing newsagency channel.
I agree it would be difficult to let go of revenue, especially from a business you have helped grow. However, competition policy is on the side of the consumer.
Behaviour I have seen recently shows that some playing in this area do not understand competition law.