The newspaper home delivery model in Australia is in crisis as more newsagents hand back home delivery runs to the publishers. Crisis is not my word, it is what some publisher insiders call it along with many newsagents.
While publishers are responding by increasing internal services for managing these handed back home delivery rounds in-house, there appears to be inaction on addressing the cause.
Many small to mid-size independent newsagents are walking from hundreds of thousands of dollars of goodwill paid when they purchased the runs. It says something about the home delivery model whey they are prepared to write off this investment rather than continue to lose money. To an outsider, this could be seen as a takeover without paying for the assets.
Publishers could stop the mass exit of home delivery by offering newsagents an equitable relationship. While this will cost significantly more than newsagents are paid today, it will cost less than the publishers providing the service in-house.
Offering fair compensation to newsagents for home delivery service would provide a basis for increasing subscriptions and through this increasing circulation. It all comes down to the will of the publishers and whether they want the current system to remain.
From numbers I have seen, home delivery fees need to double.
Back when I had home delivery in my newsagency I know customers would pay a higher fee – they are happy for the convenience of the service. Home delivery newsagents I have spoken with recently tell me the same thing. I wish that publishers had the guts to test this.
The financial challenge for newsagents of home delivery is not new. Newsagent associations and publishers know that. There have been various studies, the most comprehensive by Fairfax working with the ANF and KPMG in 2004. The net result of the various studies, workshops and meetings on the topic is that more newsagents than ever are walking away from newspaper home delivery.