PaidContent reports that a group of US newspaper executives met secretly to discuss charging for online content. Their next moves will be crucial. If they get this wrong they will suffer the same consequences of films, videos and music and have their content made available free through a variety of sources online. The Atlantic has good coverage on this story too.
Publishers need to understand that their main funding has not come from charging for access to content, it has come from advertising. To try and monetise content online through consumer payment will require a significant shift. I don’t see this working.
Look at what Dennis in the UK has done. They have created new online brands for specific demographics. They have engaged advertiser support. The financial model is based entirely around the new model and not trying to fund the high cost of the old (print) model. Look at what Crikey has done here in Australia – a pure online brand, subscription and advertiser supported and, again, based entirely around the new model.
Publishers trying to backend their operations into an online content paid for model is a recipe for failure. The people to build monetise content online most successfully will be more likely not currently working for a print media company.
Go back to the interview with Rupert Murdoch to which I referred earlier today. In discussing weather and similar services he says people will have to pay for this. No, they will not. It is too late for publishers to try and charge for what is free from so many sources.