Australian magazine publishers need to get consistent about barcode placement
Australian magazine publishers need to get serious about barcode placement on covers. Lack of consistency costs time.
Take a look at the four covers in the photo, staff selling all four or a mix have to look at the cover to check where the barcode is prior to scanning. Take 5 and That’s Life are purchased together 47% of the time according to basket data I have seen. The staff member scanning both needs to shuffle the covers based on inconsistent barcode placement.
It’s worse with New Idea and Woman’s Day given their sales volume.
If the barcode was always in the same place we would save time and, as a result, improve the shopper experience. I am sure supermarket staff would agree.
Personally, I’d like to see the barcode on the lower left corner of the cover – for every magazine. This suits the efficient swipe of the cover in front of the scanner as that corner is closest to the scanner when holding a title in front of you.
To newsagents who say it does’t matter because they use a hot key – I prefer to scan every title as it is good practice for data accuracy. Plus you can shake the title and free up greeting cards or other items in the magazine by ‘mistake’.
What about it magazine publishers? Do you want to improve the shopper experience? I hope so as you would benefit from the consistency encouraged as a result of the change too.
If you think this seems like a minor issue, think about it in the context of a newsagency processing between 250 and 1,000 transactions a day. Anything you can do to improve efficiency and consistency is a good thing.
Footnote: some magazine publishers complain about lack of compliance by newsagents in terms of scanned sales data. I suggest this would improve as a result of my barcode placement suggestion.