This is not my story. It is a story about an other newsagent family and how a competitor targeted them, leveraging their marketing in what I think was an unfair action.
The newsagents, with whom I am friends, determined to host an event in their shop for a high-profile brand of products they sell. While they are not the only retailer in their shopping centre with the brand, their approach is unique and bold and goes beyond what is traditional for the brand.
They promoted the event in-store with professional posters as well as online, through boosted Facebook posts. They spent money.
For the party, they organised prizes, specially made tasty treats themed to the product they were promoting, activities and more. It was set up as a terrific and fun family event that aimed to also sell plenty of stock but to also give people an opportunity to engage with the products, to learn and have fun beyond plain shopping.
They were exhausted by the start of the day of the event, having put in plenty of work to dress the shop and create an experience that matched their proactive marketing, but excited for what was to come.
On the morning of the event they discovered a small business competitor in the centre had cut prices of the same products to close to cost, for one day only. They announced this with a hand written sign at the store entrance, capturing traffic heading to the newsagency with the promotion.
While I accept competition is real, this promotion by the competitor to cut prices to almost cost price on the day a fellow retailer in the centre in running a value-add promotion in which they have invested considerably is, in my view, poor form. It goes beyond regular competition.
I think what the other store did is lazy marketing, disrespectful to the competitor and disrespectful to customers who love the brand being promoted.
A smart retailer would have countered with their own event, at a different time, adding value in a variety of ways. Instead, this retailer ran a spoiler sale designed solely to mute the success of the in-store party run by my friends.
There were shoppers who saw the activity for what it was, and said so. Others were happy to get the discount.
Long term, the better retailer will win as this is what shoppers will appreciate – the retailer who understands the brands they sell, who services the collectors of the brands, who offers experiences that are enjoyable beyond price based shopping.
In the meantime, sure, the almost cost price sale had an impact. But no one won. My friends had the success of their event dulled by the competitor’s actions. Any boost the competitor got was money through the register but little in the way of gross profit.
People who shop solely on price are not loyal. For the competitor to keep anyone they won through the almost cost price sale they will have to keep discounting. I can’t see the upside in that.
Retailers in local shopping precincts and in shopping malls have to walk a fine line in handling competition. While I get that all is fair in competition, there are ethical lines one should not cross. I think what the competitor did in this instance is a crossing of an ethical line.